Monday Roundup

COVID treatment

Monday Roundup

David Ermer–Congress, COVID treatment, COVID vaccine mandate, COVID-19, COVID-19 testing, U.S. Healthcare–
Photo by Sven Read on Unsplash

From Capitol Hill, Roll Call discusses the Senate Parliamentarian’s role in refereeing budget reconciliation bills like the Build Back Better Act.

Senate committees have been updating the House-passed $2.2 trillion climate and social spending package text to ensure it complies with budget reconciliation rules, but most have yet to begin the formal review process with the Senate parliamentarian known as “the Byrd bath.”

Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer sent a “Dear Colleague” letter on Monday reiterating his goal to pass the legislation in the Senate before Christmas. But the update he provided on the procedural steps needed to get there suggests senators will be lucky if they can meet that deadline. 

Schumer said Senate committees are continuing informal conversations with Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough about their pieces of the package and “making necessary technical and ‘Byrd proofing’ edits to the House bill.” The Byrd rule requires any policy changes made through reconciliation to have more than a “merely incidental” impact on the budget, among other restrictions.

From the COVID vaccine front, Medscape informs us that

Adolescents and adults younger than age 21 who develop myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination frequently have abnormal findings on cardiac MRI(cMRI) but most have a mild clinical course with rapid resolution of symptoms, a new study concludes.

“This study supports what we’ve been seeing. People identified and treated early and appropriately for the rare complication of COVID-19 vaccine-related myocarditis typically experienced only mild cases and short recovery times,” American Heart Association (AHA) President Donald M. Lloyd-Jones, MD, said in a podcast.

“Overwhelmingly, the data continue to indicate the benefits of COVID-19 vaccine far outweigh any very rare risks of adverse events from the vaccine, including myocarditis,” Lloyd-Jones added.

and that

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Friday authorized the use of Eli Lilly’s COVID-19 dual-antibody therapy in treating mild to moderate symptoms in all children, including newborns, who are at risk of severe illness.

The therapy, bamlanivimab plus etesevimab, was previously authorized for children aged 12 years and older and weighed at least 88 pounds.

“Children under one year of age, who are exposed to the virus that causes COVID-19, may be at particularly high risk for severe COVID-19 and this authorization addresses the medical needs of this vulnerable population,” said Patrizia Cavazzoni, director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

The FDA authorization also allows the administration of the therapy as a preventive measure in children who are exposed to the virus.

Per STAT News

People who received the Pfizer (PFE)-BioNTech (BNTX) vaccines may get as much benefit from a Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) booster shot as a Pfizer one, The New York Times explains, citing the findings of a small study released on Sunday. Researchers at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston studied 65 people who had received two shots of the Pfizer vaccine. Six months after the second dose, the researchers gave 24 of the volunteers a third dose of the Pfizer vaccine and gave 41 the Johnson & Johnson shot. The study was funded in part by Johnson & Johnson and has not yet been published in a scientific journal.

As of today according to the Centers for Disease Control, 60% of the U.S. population is fully vaccinated and 25% of the U.S. population over age 18 has had a booster.

From the Delta variant testing front

  • The American Medical Association reviews the different COVID tests that are available in our country. The article warns that the at home tests must be performed correctly. This will be useful information to share with health plan members.
  • A friend of the FEHBlog pointed out this HHS website that lists low or or no COVID cost testing facilities in each of the states and DC. Another friend of the FEHBlog informed him that local public libraries in the Washington DC area offer at home rapid COVID tests like Binax to their visitors at no cost. The FEHBlog learned long ago that when a health plan is asked to provide a service or supply that it typically does not cover, like over the counter drugs or tests, you typically can find a government resource to fill the gap. To soften the financial blow of the the President’s unexpected mandate that health plans cover the cost of at home rapid COVID tests, health plans also should consider educating members about community resources.

Speaking of which, Health Payer Intelligence reports on payer efforts to fund various community resources to address the social determinants of health, a thoughtful idea particularly at the holiday season.

Thursday Miscellany

David Ermer–Congress, COVID treatment, COVID vaccine mandate, COVID-19, COVID-19 testing, Rx coverage–

From the Capitol Hill front, Roll Call reports that

The Senate looks set to clear a House-passed a temporary spending bill Thursday night that would keep the lights on at federal agencies through Feb. 18, buying 11 more weeks to try to resolve partisan disputes over funding levels and policy riders that have stalled progress on fiscal 2022 appropriations.

The stopgap measure passed the House on a 221-212 vote earlier in the evening. The Senate timeline cleared up once it became apparent a group of GOP conservatives would get an up-or-down vote on an amendment to bar funding to implement a new private sector vaccine mandate.

“I think we’re gonna get our amendment at a 50-vote threshold,” Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., told reporters after the House vote. 

A Senate GOP leadership aide said the vote would occur in that chamber Thursday evening. With three absences on the Republican side, senators expected Marshall’s amendment to be defeated, which would set up a vote on clearing the stopgap bill for President Joe Biden’s signature ahead of a midnight Friday deadline to avert a partial government shutdown.

So as the FEHBlog expect, no government shutdown which is good news.

From the Delta variant front —

STAT News informs us that

Health officials on Thursday reported the country’s second Covid-19 infection from the Omicron variant in a Minnesota resident who notably did not travel internationally recently, unlike the first case.

The case in Minnesota is an adult male who had been vaccinated and, in early November, received a booster shot. He lives in Hennepin County, which includes Minneapolis, state health officials said. He developed mild symptoms on Nov. 22, was tested on Nov. 24, and no longer has symptoms. 

The man had been in New York City in the days leading up to feeling sick and attended the Anime NYC 2021 convention at the Javits Center from Nov. 19 to Nov. 21. Minnesota health officials are collaborating with New York City authorities and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on their case investigation.

Bloomberg adds

In some of the first data to come back on the omicron variant of the coronavirus, researchers in South Africa, where it was first identified, say the mutation is spreading faster than the delta strain. There also seems to be a greater risk of reinfection—where previously infected people get the virus again. Three times higher, in fact. But scientists also said hospitalizations in South Africa remain muted, a sign that may be attributable in part to vaccinations. Shabir Madhi, a vaccinologist at the University of the Witwatersrand, said he’s “optimistic that in this resurgence, while the total number of cases will probably be greater, hospitalizations and deaths will be lower.” —David E. Rovella

The Wall Street Journal reports that

Early laboratory studies suggest that a Covid-19 antibody treatment developed byGlaxoSmithKline GSK 0.24% PLC and Vir Biotechnology Inc. VIR -2.19% is effective against the Omicron variant, the companies said, setting it apart from similar therapies that appear to work less well against the highly mutated strain.

The companies said Thursday that they had tested the drug, called sotrovimab, against certain individual mutations found in Omicron, which has now been detected in at least 24 countries, including the U.S. Glaxo and Vir said the findings were preliminary and they would need to test the treatment against the whole of the mutated spike protein found in the variant to confirm the result. The companies published the preliminary research, which hasn’t yet been peer reviewed.

From the White House, the President announced a bevy of new COVID control measures today. Of particular interest to health plans is the following one:

Providing health plan coverage of no-cost rapid, over-the-counter (OTC) COVID-19 tests:  To expand access and affordability of at-home COVID-19 tests, the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and the Treasury will issue guidance by January 15th to clarify that individuals who purchase OTC COVID-19 diagnostic tests will be able to seek reimbursement from their group health plan or health insurance issuer and have insurance cover the cost during the public health emergency. Workplace screening would remain consistent with current guidance. 

That workplace guidance currently requires the employer to fund the cost of testing, e.g., in programs that require vaccinations or weekly testing / masking. However, I think that once this Pandora’s box is open, employers will be telling their employees to pick up a test at the local pharmacy if they need to be tested. What’s stopping them? Healthcare Dive explains that the mandate will remove the market incentive currently on manufacturers to lower costs.

The plan is a potential boon for medtech companies that produce at-home tests. With insurers on the hook for payment, it may drive up demand, particularly among those who were sensitive to prices before. Abbott, BD and Quidel are big players in the at-home testing space.

Furthermore the FEHBlog doesn’t see the sense in taking this step before the Food and Drug Administration give emergency use authorization to Merck and Pfizer COVID pills to treat COVID at its onset.

From the COVID vaccine mandate front, Beckers Hospital Review reports that

HHS is appealing a federal court’s decision to temporarily block the start of its vaccination mandate for healthcare workers, according to Bloomberg Law. 

U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty in Louisiana granted a preliminary injunction Nov. 30 halting the vaccination rule for healthcare workers until legal challenges are resolved.  * * *

HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra and other defendants filed an appeal Dec. 1. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit will hear the appeal. 

From the pharmacy front —

Healthcare Dive informs us that

CVS Health and Microsoft are forming a strategic alliance to co-develop products around the areas of personalized care and digital health, the two companies announced Thursday.

CVS said it plans to use Microsoft’s computing capabilities to deliver more customized health recommendations when and where consumers need them as the retail pharmacy giant continues to focus on digitally enabled and consumer-centric health services. The two will also look for new ways to leverage technology and machine learning to automate CVS operations and reduce waste.

Fierce Healthcare tells us that

CVS Pharmacy is expanding an in-app feature for visually impaired patients, which reads prescription information out loud, to all of its nearly 10,000 U.S. locations.

The solution, called Spoken Rx, was designed in collaboration with the American Council of the Blind. Patients enrolled in the program can scan the labels on their prescription containers and have their information, including the medication’s name and directions for use, read out loud to them in either English or Spanish.

* * * The feature is free to all patients who enroll. CVS can provide a standalone speaker device to read prescription labels if the patient doesn’t have a smartphone.

CVS also offers ScripTalk on its website, which allows patients who get their medications delivered to their homes to have their prescriptions read aloud through the separate ScripTalk app. The pharmacy giant first made the service available in 2014.

The company has options for braille and large-print prescription labels through their online pharmacy too.

Tuesday’s Tidbits

David Ermer–AHRQ, CDC, COVID treatment, COVID vaccine mandate, COVID-19, COVID-19 testing, COVID-19 vaccine, Telehealth, U.S. Healthcare–

From the Delta variant vaccination and treatment front, AHIP informs us that

The Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Antimicrobial Drugs Advisory Committee (AMDAC) held a meeting to discuss the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 antiviral treatment molnupiravir, developed by Merck and Ridgeback Biotherapeutics. The oral treatment is the first COVID-19 therapy that could be taken outside a clinical setting. The Committee reviewed data by Merck and the FDA on molnupiravir’s toxicity, efficacy, and safety, and discussed concerns over treatment of pregnant persons and the potential effects of viral mutation and evolution. Initial data from Merck showed that molnupiravir reduced the hospitalization risk among high-risk patients by 48%, however data released November 26 suggests the reduction in hospitalizations may be closer to 30%.

The Committee voted 13-10 that the potential benefits of molnupiravir outweigh the known and potential risks when used for the treatment of mild-moderate COVID-19 in adult patients who are within 5 days of symptom onset and are at high risk of severe COVID-19, including hospitalization or death. Given concerns about the potential harmful effects on fetal development, Committee members further stressed the need for pregnancy testing prior to taking molnupiravir.

The FDA will review AMDAC’s conclusions and formally decide whether or not to grant emergency use authorization (EUA) to molnupiravir in the coming weeks. 

Acting Food and Drug Commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock announced

The [Food and Drug Administration] is working as quickly as possible to evaluate the potential impact of this variant on the currently available diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines. We are closely monitoring the situation and are committed to communicating with the public as we learn more. 

Historically, the work to obtain the genetic information and patient samples for variants and then perform the testing needed to evaluate their impact takes time. However, we expect the vast majority of this work to be completed in the coming weeks.

Healthcare Dive informs us that

The emergence of a new COVID-19 variant, named Omicron (B.1.1.529), is putting pressure on diagnostics manufacturers who test for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 to ensure its results are not impacted. Thermo Fisher Scientific, Qiagen and Lucira Health were quick to claim their tests can detect the emerging variant.    

The Wall Street Journal reports that

The Omicron variant of the Covid-19 virus could lead to more infections among vaccinated people, according to several scientists, but some said there were reasons to believe the shots would protect against severe disease.

While the new variant might evade the antibodies generated in reaction to the vaccines, the virus will likely remain vulnerable to immune cells that destroy it once it enters the body, said Ugur Sahin, co-founder of BioNTech SE, which sells a Covid-19 shot with partner Pfizer Inc.

“Our message is: Don’t freak out, the plan remains the same: Speed up the administration of a third booster shot,” Dr. Sahin said in an interview Tuesday.

In that regard, Govexec.com notes that “Pfizer/BioNTech are expected to apply for approval for their booster shots for 16 and 17 year olds and the FDA “could authorize extra shots within roughly a week,” The New York Times reported on Monday.”

In COVID vaccine mandate legal news, the FEHBlog was quite surprised to read in Govexec that

On Tuesday, a federal judge temporarily blocked the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal contractors in three states.

U.S. District Judge Gregory Van Tatenhove, who serves in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, issued a preliminary injunction for the vaccine mandate for federal contractors and subcontractors in all covered contracts in Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee. Following President Biden’s issuance of the executive order on the mandate on September 9, there have been numerous legal challenges. 

“This is not a case about whether vaccines are effective. They are. Nor is this a case about whether the government, at some level, and in some circumstances, can require citizens to obtain vaccines. It can,” wrote Van Tatenhove. “The question presented here is narrow. Can the president use congressionally delegated authority to manage the federal procurement of goods and services to impose vaccines on the employees of federal contractors and subcontractors? In all likelihood, the answer to that question is ‘no.’”

The New York Times adds

A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction on Tuesday to halt the start of President Biden’s national vaccine mandate for health care workers, which had been set to begin next week. 

The injunction, written by Judge Terry A. Doughty, effectively expanded a separate order issued on Monday by a federal court in Missouri. The earlier one had applied only to 10 states that joined in a lawsuit against the president’s decision to require all health workers in hospitals and nursing homes to receive at least their first shot by Dec. 6 and to be fully vaccinated by Jan. 4.

“There is no question that mandating a vaccine to 10.3 million health care workers is something that should be done by Congress, not a government agency,” Judge Doughty of U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana wrote. He added: “It is not clear that even an act of Congress mandating a vaccine would be constitutional.”

The plaintiffs, he added, also have an “interest in protecting its citizens from being required to submit to vaccinations” and to prevent the loss of jobs and tax revenue that may result from the mandate.

It looks like the vaccine mandates are creating more work Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litgation.

From the HIV front —

  • The National Institutes of Health tells us that “Among people with HIV worldwide who are receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART), adults are getting closer to the global target of 95% achieving viral suppression, but progress among children and adolescents is lagging and long-term viral suppression among all groups remains a challenge. These findings of a study funded by the National Institutes of Health suggest that substantial efforts are needed to help people with HIV durably suppress the virus. The findings were published today in the journal The Lancet HIV.”
  • The Centers for Disease Control informs us that “Improving access to and use of HIV services for [men having sex with men] MSM, particularly Black MSM, Hispanic/Latino MSM, and younger MSM, is essential to ending the HIV epidemic in the United States.”
  • Here is a link to the CDC’s website on HIV treatment.

From the tidbits department —

  • Fierce Healthcare calls to our attention the fact that

The Business Group on Health has identified several trends in health and wellness to keep an eye on next year, which they say highlight the sense of “collective urgency” employers and their workforces feel.

For example, the organization echoed an ongoing industry trend: virtual care isn’t going away following a massive increase in use during the pandemic. However, the Business Group argues that taking full advantage of its strengths will require integration with in-person offerings.

  • The Society for Human Resource Management, having lost respect for the Delta variant, discusses how the Omicron variant may impact the workplace.
  • AHRQ tells us that “Patients with retail medications to treat opioid use disorders spent on average 3.4 times more for out-of-pocket prescriptions than the rest of the U.S. population, according to an AHRQ-study published in the Journal of Substance Abuse and Treatment.” No bueno.
  • Also “AHRQ has released an updated Chartbook on Rural Healthcare that shows that people in rural areas face difficulty getting timely, high-quality, affordable healthcare. 
  • HHS’s Office for Civil Rights which enforces the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules now has settled in OCR’s favor 25 complaints against healthcare providers for allegedly violating HIPAA’s individual right to access medical records.

Holiday Weekend Update

David Ermer–ACA, COVID treatment, COVID-19, Federal employment benefits, U.S. Healthcare–
Hanukkah greeting template. Nine candles and wishing. Hand drawn sketch illustration. White, yellow and blue colors

Congress returns from the holiday weekend tomorrow for Committee business and floor voting. The Wall Street Journal reports that

Democrats will sort through a heavy pile of to-do items when they return to Washington, including ironing out disagreements over their Build Back Better bill, keeping the government funded and boosting the debt limit before the U.S. runs out of money to pay its obligations.

The party’s $2 trillion education, healthcare and climate package, which passed the House before the Thanksgiving recess, now heads to the 50-50 Senate, where Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) is hoping to approve the legislation before Christmas.

Senate Democrats need to reach unanimous agreement on the policy proposals and work through expected procedural challenges, both of which could mean changes to the package. * * *

Republicans blocked an attempt to vote on a bipartisan slate of 20 amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act, a $777.9 billion annual defense-policy bill, before leaving for Thanksgiving break. Democrats set up a procedural vote Monday at a 60-vote threshold on a substitute bill that has GOP amendments. If 60 senators agree to move forward, final passage could happen soon.

Meanwhile, funding for current government programs runs out after Friday, Dec. 3, giving lawmakers just days to pass legislation preventing a government shutdown. Some Democrats have pushed for a very short-term extension of government funding, possibly through Dec. 17, while Republicans are seeking an extension that lasts into 2022.

Some Republicans have signaled that they would accept holding funding for existing government programs flat for the fiscal year, which would preserve funding levels negotiated under the Trump administration. Democrats want to increase funding levels.

Prof. Katie Keith, writing in the Health Affairs blog, provides an overview of the healthcare provisions found in the version of the Democrat’s $2 trillion social and climate oriented budget reconciliation bill, a/k/a the Build Back Better bill which is now pending before the Senate as noted by the Wall Street Journal above. Two of the bill’s provisions would impact group health plans, presumably including FEHB plans:

“Beginning with the 2023 plan year, group health plans and insurers offering individual or group health insurance coverage would be required to cover certain insulin products on a pre-deductible basis and with limited cost sharing. Cost sharing would be capped at $35 or 25 percent of the negotiated price, whichever is lower, for a 30-day supply of insulin. Any associated out-of-pocket costs would be counted towards a consumer’s annual deductible and out-of-pocket maximum. CBO estimates that these new requirements will cost, on average, $2 billion annually. * * * The legislation would define both “insulin” and “selected insulin products” and makes clear that plans and insurers could charge higher cost sharing for products that do not meet these definitions. Higher cost sharing could also apply if a consumer receives the selected insulin products from an out-of-network provider.”

The Wall Street Journal adds that “[The Senate Majority Leader] Mr. Schumer said at a press conference in New York last weekend that the insulin cap could face procedural problems.”

The other Build Back Better bill’s provision affecting group health plans would require insurers and prescription benefit managers to semi-annually report to employers and other plan sponsors on prescription drug spending in their health plans.

The report would reflect information on dispensed drugs, utilization, costs, out-of-pocket spending, drug manufacturer copay assistance, and compensation paid to brokers and other consultants, among many other data elements laid out in the law. The law would impose civil monetary penalties for violating these requirements, and insurers and PBMs could not enter into contracts with gag clauses that prevent these disclosures.

Group health plans, insurers, and PBMs could restrict public access to cost data but would have to disclose reported information to federal officials. Federal agencies would also be required to develop separate, more limited reporting requirements. This requirement would go into effect for plan years that begin on or after January 1, 2023.

This reporting requirement seems to duplicate Section 204 of the No Surprises Act. Speaking of unnecessary complexity, health plan expert Robert Moffitt reminds us in the Hill that Congress has not yet bothered to repeal the dormant MultiState Plan Program provisions in the Affordable Care Act.

As explained in this KFF article, the Build Back Better bill also would allow the federal government authority to negotiate certain drug prices for the Medicare program, and moreover Section 8926 of the Build Back Better bill (HR 5376) would require FEHB plans to participate in this “fair price negotiation program.”

From the Delta variant front, we learned on Friday that the Delta variant has a new competition named the Omicron variant. The Wall Street Journal explains that

The WHO designated the strain a “variant of concern,” formally alerting health authorities around the world to the extra risks it appears to carry. To qualify as a variant of concern, a new virus strain has to be proved to be more contagious, lead to more serious illness or decrease the effectiveness of public-health measures, Covid-19 tests, treatments or vaccines.

Other variants of concern include the Delta variant, which is now dominant world-wide, and the Alpha variant, which drove a deadly wave of infections across Europe and the U.S. last winter and spring.

STAT News adds that

“Right now there are many studies that are underway,” Maria Van Kerkhove, the World Health Organization’s technical lead on Covid-19, said Friday. “There is a lot of work that is ongoing in South Africa and in other countries to better characterize the variant itself, in terms of transmissibility, in terms of severity, and any impact on our countermeasures, like the use of diagnostics, therapeutics, or vaccines. So far, there is little information, but those studies are underway, so we need researchers to have the time to carry them out.”

She added: “It will take days to weeks for some of these studies to be undertaken.” * * *

For now, perhaps the most pressing questions about Omicron are: Is it more transmissible than even the Delta variant, and if so, how much? And to what extent can it evade immune protection generated by earlier infections or vaccines?

On the transmissibility question, experts will watch closely to see how Omicron continues to play out in South Africa and elsewhere. * * *

With new variants, vaccines can lose a step at blocking infections — particularly if the antibodies they elicit aren’t able to recognize the virus as well — but still largely maintain their ability to guard against severe disease and death because of the broader immune response, including T cells. This has happened already to varying degrees with other variants, to the greatest extent with the Beta variant and even to some extent with Delta. It’s also possible that if there’s a greater degree of immune escape, a higher percentage of breakthrough cases will lead to serious outcomes. That wouldn’t point to complete vaccine failure — but it would point to reduction in vaccine effectiveness.

In other news —

The obesity rate among emerging adults — who researchers defined as individuals aged 18 to 25 years — increased more than 26 percentage points over a 42-year span, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data show. * * * *

“Emerging adulthood may be a key period for preventing and treating obesity given that habits formed during this period often persist through the remainder of the life course,” Ellison-Barnes and colleagues wrote. “There is an urgent need for research on risk factors contributing to obesity during this developmental stage to inform the design of interventions as well as policies aimed at prevention.”

  • The Federal Employee Benefits Open Season ends two weeks from tomorrow, December 13, 2021.
  • Precision Vaccinations reminds us that an FDA advisory committee will meet on Tuesday November 30 to “discuss Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) 000108, submitted by Merck & Co. Inc., for emergency use of molnupiravir oral capsules for treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 in adults who are at risk for progressing to severe COVID-19 and/or hospitalization.” The New York Times adds that

In briefing documents posted to the F.D.A.’s website on Friday, agency reviewers did not take a position on whether the drug should be authorized, though they found that the clinical trial data did not show any major safety concerns and that the drug was effective in preventing severe disease. * * *

Merck’s initial estimate that the drug reduced hospitalization and death by 50 percent came from an early look at results from 775 study participants. The updated figure announced on Friday came from more than 1,400. In the final analysis, the participants who received molnupiravir had a 6.8 percent risk of being hospitalized, and one patient died. Those who received a placebo had a 9.7 percent risk of being hospitalized, and nine died.

Dr. David Boulware, an infectious disease researcher at the University of Minnesota, said he expected the drug would still receive emergency authorization. If the expert committee endorses it and the F.D.A. heeds the recommendation, the treatment could be authorized in the United States as soon as next week.

“The reduction in hospitalization is a little bit less, but there is still a big mortality benefit if you start early,” he said.

Tuesday’s Tidbits

David Ermer–ACA, Congress, COVID treatment, COVID-19, COVID-19 testing, COVID-19 vaccine, OPM, U.S. Healthcare–
Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

From the Delta variant front, David Leonhardt in the New York Times Mornings column tries to place the pre-Thanksgiving increase in COVID cases in perspective. He encourages readers to recognize that it’s the cadre over 65 and particularly those in their 80’s and 90’s who are threatened by COVID.

Covid is the threat on many of our minds. But for most people under 65, the virus may present less risk than a car trip to visit relatives this week.

The situation is more frightening for older people, especially those in their 80s and 90s. For the oldest age groups, Covid presents a real risk even after vaccination. It appears to be more dangerous than a typical flu and much more dangerous than time spent riding in a vehicle, based on C.D.C. data.

As a result, older Americans need protection during a surge. (The same is also true of a small percentage of younger people with specific vulnerabilities to Covid, like organ-transplant recipients.) The most effective way to protect vulnerable people is through vaccination — not only of them but also of others who might infect them [e.g., initial vaccinations for children beginning at age 5 and young teenagers and boosters for fully vaccinated adults, after two months for the Johnson & Johnson vaccine and six months for the mRNA vaccines.]

STAT News reminds us that the FDA will consider granting emergency use authorization to the Merck anti-viral pill for treating early COVID next Tuesday. However,

[C]linical trials for both the Pfizer and Merck antivirals focused on unvaccinated people with at least one risk factor for developing severe Covid-19. Trial data, as disclosed by the drug companies, shows them to be remarkably effective: No patient in either study died after being treated with a course of antivirals.

But it might be difficult to get the drugs outside a clinical trial setting. Depending on the particular patient, it could involve four individual steps: recognizing symptoms, receiving a positive Covid-19 test result, being prescribed an antiviral by a doctor, and picking up the pills at a nearby pharmacy.

Each step could prove difficult, Gaffney said, beginning with the challenge of recognizing symptoms during winter, when early signs of Covid-19 might be easily written off as a cold, flu, or allergies. Even if patients do quickly suspect they have Covid, diagnostic tests are still sometimes hard to come by. Many of the patients who test positive won’t have primary care physicians. And perhaps worst: The antivirals are ideally taken just three days after symptom onset, meaning the four-step process can’t face any setbacks.

Of all the challenges patients will face when seeking the antiviral treatments, the lack of access to efficient testing is by far the largest. * * *

[Céline] Gounder, a physician and NYU professor who served on President Biden’s Covid advisory board in the months before his inauguration] suggested that some immunocompromised people, for instance, should be prescribed the antivirals preemptively, if they’re exposed to Covid but haven’t tested positive — eliminating a potentially burdensome step. * * *

Ideally, though, people who live outside congregate settings would be able to access the same level of service at retail pharmacies. Other fixes, Gounder suggested, could include issuing a “standing order” for the drugs — essentially, allowing an entire city or state’s population to receive the drugs without a prescription.

In other words, we are close to having a Flonase for COVID.

From the Delta variant vaccine mandate front, the Wall Street Journal reports that

The Biden administration on Tuesday filed an emergency court motion that seeks the immediate reinstatement of its rules requiring many employers to ensure their workers are vaccinated or tested weekly for Covid-19.

The Justice Department filed the request with the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati, which last week was designated as the court that would decide legal challenges filed around the country to the vaccine-or-testing rules.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration earlier this month formally issued the requirements, which apply to businesses with 100 or more employees. The rules cover roughly 84 million workers and are scheduled to take effect Jan. 4.

Also because the government contractor mandate requires contractors to verify its employees’ COVID vaccination status with supporting documents, the Society for Human Resource Management offers guidance on how employers can recognize fake vaccination cards.

From the tidbits department —

  • The Federal Times informs us that “Legislation introduced in the House Tuesday would not only establish credentials necessary for all future Office of Personnel Management directors, but also formally dictate the agency’s role in leading human resources through data-driven and modern policy. Under the bill, introduced by Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., a nominee for OPM director would have to have prior human capital experience and be chosen without regard for political affiliation.”

The [independent dispute] system chosen by the Biden administration was expected to push insurance premiums down by 0.5% to 1%, the Congressional Budget Office estimated.

“Everyone has to give a little to get to a good place,” [HHS Secretary] Becerra said. “That sweet spot, I hope, is one where patients … are extracted from that food fight [between out of network providers and health plans]. And if there continues to be a food fight, the arbitration process will help settle it in a way that is efficient, but it also will lead to lower costs.”

  • The International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans provides its insights into the new proposed rule on ACA reporting referenced in yesterday’s FEHBlog post. The proposed rule would provide:

— An Automatic 30-Day Extension of Deadline for Furnishing Statements Under Sections 6055 and 6056

— An Alternative Manner of Furnishing Statements Under Section 6055 During Taxable Years When the Individual Shared Responsibility Payment is Zero

Under the proposed alternative manner of furnishing, the reporting entity must post a clear and conspicuous notice on the entity’s website stating that responsible individuals may receive a copy of their statement upon request. The notice must include an email address, a physical address to which a request may be sent, and a telephone number that responsible individuals may use to contact a reporting entity with any questions.

The public comment period on this IRS proposed rule ends in roughly sixty days.

  • Govexec offers a helpful to-do list for the ongoing Federal Benefits Open Season from Nov. 8-Dec. 13
  1. Use the plan comparison tools available at OPM’s website and Checkbook’s Guide to Federal Health Plans to compare the top three or four health plan options for you and your family’s needs.
  2. Register to attend a virtual health fair hosted by the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program. There will be live chat days on Nov. 12, Nov. 19, Dec. 1, and Dec. 8. 
  3. The National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association’s Federal Benefits Institute will have a variety of resources available during open season, including a live webinar series. 

Monday Roundup

David Ermer–COVID treatment, COVID-19, COVID-19 vaccine, Rx coverage, U.S. Healthcare–
Photo by Sven Read on UnsplashFr

From the Delta variant front, STAT News informs us that

Pfizer and BioNTech announced Monday that their Covid-19 vaccine was 100% efficacious in preventing infections in 12- to 15-year-olds, measured from seven days to four months after administration of the second dose of the vaccine.

The companies said the new data — a longer-term analysis of a Phase 3 trial conducted in 2,228 participants — will form the basis of an application to the Food and Drug Administration for an extension of their Covid-19 vaccine license to cover youths in the age group. 

“These are the first and only disclosed longer-term data demonstrating the safety and efficacy of a Covid- 19 vaccine in individuals 12 to 15 years of age,” Ugur Sahin, CEO and co-founder of BioNTech, said in a statement. “The growing body of data we have compiled from clinical trials and real-world surveillance to date strengthen the base of evidence supporting the strong efficacy and favorable safety profile of our Covid-19 vaccine across adolescent and adult populations.”

Astra-Zeneca announced late last week that

New data from the AZD7442 COVID-19 PROVENT prevention and TACKLE outpatient treatment Phase III trials both showed robust efficacy from a one-time intramuscular (IM) dose of the long-acting antibody (LAAB) combination.

In an analysis of the ongoing PROVENT trial evaluating a median six months of participant follow-up, one 300mg IM dose of AZD7442 reduced the risk of developing symptomatic COVID-19 compared to placebo by 83%.

About 2% of the global population is considered at increased risk of an inadequate response to a COVID-19 vaccine.1 This includes people with blood cancers or other cancers being treated with chemotherapy, patients on dialysis, those taking medications after an organ transplant or who are taking immunosuppressive drugs for conditions including multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis.2-6

The AZD7442 PROVENT trial is the first Phase III trial prospectively designed to evaluate a monoclonal antibody for pre-exposure prophylaxis of symptomatic COVID-19, with targeted inclusion of high-risk and immunocompromised participants. More than 75% of PROVENT participants at baseline had co-morbidities that put them at high risk for severe COVID-19 if they were to become infected, including people who are immunocompromised and may have a reduced immune response to vaccination.

There were no cases of severe COVID-19 or COVID-19-related deaths in those treated with  AZD7442 at either the primary or six-month analyses. In the placebo arm, there were two additional cases of severe COVID-19 at the six-month assessment, for a total of five cases of severe COVID-19 and two COVID-related deaths.

Developing new early treatment options is encouraging news. Kaiser Health News reminds us that the success of these new early anti-viral treatments hinges on widespread availability of inexpensive at home COVID tests.

From the Delta variant vaccine mandate front, Federal News Network tells us that

More than 90% of federal employees have received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine by the president’s deadline, a senior administration official said Monday.

Most of those employees are fully vaccinated, the Biden administration said. All told, some 95% of employees have taken steps to comply with the Biden administration’s federal vaccine mandate by the Nov. 22 deadline — a figure that includes partially and fully vaccinated employees, as well as those who have a medical or religious exception pending or approved.

“Critically, the Nov. 22 deadline is not an end point; we continue to see more and more federal employees providing their information and getting their shots,” the administration official said in an email.

Agencies will continue to collect information, as well as requests for exceptions “due to documented medical necessities” in the coming days, the White House said.

The Office of Management and Budget will release a more detailed breakdown of vaccination rates within individual agencies on Wednesday.

The Society for Human Resource Management offers an article about the role of boosters in employer sponsored vaccination programs:

All U.S. adults are now eligible to receive a COVID-19 vaccine booster, so long as a certain number of months have passed since their last dose. As employers revise their vaccination policies, they may be wondering if they should require workers to get an extra jab to be considered “fully vaccinated.” Here’s what employment law attorneys had to say. 

At least for now, employment law attorneys recommend that businesses hold off on mandating booster shots.

“At this point, I think it is probably too soon to make those updates,” said Jim Hermon, an attorney with Dykema in Detroit. 

John Thomas Jr., an attorney with McGuireWoods in Tysons, Va., noted that employers are focused on helping their employees get over the hurdle of initial vaccination. “Some geographic areas—and some industries—are still struggling to reach a critical mass of people willing to get the shot in the first place.”  * * *

Although it may be too soon for many employers to add booster shots to their vaccination policies, attorneys said workplace leaders can start planning now. 

“I think it is company-specific,” said Katherine Dudley Helms, an attorney with Ogletree Deakins in Columbia, S.C. Some workplaces have seen a high percentage of employees get vaccinated, she said, so it might make sense to add the boosters to their recommendations as the shots are authorized. 

On the other hand, she noted, if the workforce vaccination rate is low or vaccination has been a battle for the employer, it may be wiser to try to focus on raising the rate of initial vaccination rather than adding the booster on top of that. Even with this approach, she said, an employer can certainly support and encourage employees who are eligible and wish to get the booster shot.

“My experience is that those who do not mandate vaccinations are preparing policies and practical plans for the likelihood that they may become mandatory either because of federal requirements or because the timing is right,” Helms observed.

Just as with the initial vaccinations, she said, employers should let workers know if the company will pay for the costs associated with getting the booster, including the time spent getting the shot. Employers should also address how time off will be treated if employees have a reaction.

From the Rx coverage from, Med City News reports on Walgreen’s new strategy. “The company launched a new health division, and has doubled down on its plans to open primary care clinics with VillageMD. It faces big competitors in CVS and Walmart, and it’ll take time to see if its new strategy pays off.” Walgreen’s, of course, is not alone in this endeavor.

Neal Batra and David Betts, who have studied consumers’ thoughts on healthcare for Deloitte, said people are primarily looking for three things: meaningful interactions with their provider, visits that make economic sense, and convenience. Booking a visit a month out to spend 10 minutes with a doctor ticks none of these boxes.

“We’ve believed for a long time that this [retail approach taken by Walgreen’s, CVS Health and Walmart, among others] is the direction that consumer healthcare will go. What we see now is that playing out,” said Betts, who leads the public health transformation effort for Deloitte Consulting.

The pandemic, in some ways, accelerated that. People didn’t want to sit in busy waiting rooms, and were more open to other care modalities, like telehealth. Pharmacy chains were also given big contracts for Covid-19 testing and vaccines, driving more people to their stores.

Batra, a principal in Deloitte’s Life Sciences and Health Care practice, said “it’s super logical” for retailers to look at primary care, because it involves routine visits and engagement points.

“It’s a very natural place to enter,” he said. “Are you going to see some of these models continue what we would call an upmarket march to go after more and more complex aspects of primary care, or even dip their toe into specific therapy areas that are more specialized? It remains to be seen, but our expectation is yes.”

For example, pharmacies could offer blood-pressure measurements, and blood-glucose testing for people with prediabetes or diabetes. For retailers, the cost of doing this would be relatively low, while the value for patients would be high.

From the ACA front, the Internal Revenue Service today released a proposed rule on ACA reporting by insurers and self-funded employers, Forms 1095 and 1096. The FEHBlog still needs to review it. The reporting which was developed to support enforcement of the ACA’s tax penalties for failure to carry minimum essential coverage are a mysterious component of the zeroed out penalty world that has existed for three years. The handful of states and DC which have adopted individual mandates can use the IRS forms.

Friday Stats and More

David Ermer–ACA, COVID treatment, COVID-19, COVID-19 vaccine, Telehealth, U.S. Healthcare–

Based on the Centers for Disease Control’s COVID Data Tracker and using Thursday as the first day of the week, here is the FEHBlog’s weekly chart of new COVID cases:

Here is a link to the CDC’s weekly chart of new COVID hospital admissions which trended up by 5.4% from last week. However, the FEHBlog’s weekly chart of new COVID deaths has begun to trend down again.

Here’s FEHBlog’s weekly chart of new COVID vaccinations distributed and administered.

The vaccinations administered line continues to trend up. The CDC’s COVID vaccinations site now displays vaccinations administered to the age 5 to 11 group. Nearly 70% of the over age 12 population is fully vaccinated, and 97.5% of the age 65+ population has received at least one dose of the COVID vaccine. That’s impressive.

In Delta variant booster news, the CDC informs us that over one quarter of the age 50+ has received the booster. AHIP informs us that

Today the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) amended the emergency use authorizations (EUA) for both the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines, authorizing use of a single booster dose for all individuals 18 years of age and older after completion of primary vaccination with any FDA-authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccine. This amendment expands the use of booster doses of both vaccines to include all adults at least six months after completion of the primary vaccination series of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine or Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine or at least two months after completion of primary vaccination with the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) also met today to discuss further clinical recommendations on the use of COVID-19 vaccine booster doses for adults. After reviewing the most recent safety and efficacy data of the Pfizer and Moderna booster doses, which showed the vaccines to be safe, the Committee unanimously (11-0) voted in favor of authorizing:

— A single COVID-19 vaccine booster dose is recommended for persons aged 18 and olderwho received an mRNA COVID vaccine primary series based on individual benefits and risks, at least 6 months after the primary series, under the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).

— A single COVID vaccine booster dose is recommended for persons aged 50 and older who received an mRNA COVID vaccine, at least 6 months after the primary series, under the FDA’s EUA.

Any FDA-approved or authorized COVID-19 vaccine can be used for a booster dose, regardless of vaccine received for a primary series.

The committee emphasized that the top priority continues to be vaccination of the unvaccinated, and that potential side effects of vaccination, such as incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis, need continual monitoring as more data becomes available.

Medscape adds that

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Rochelle Walensky, MD, signed off on a recommendation Friday evening to let all US adults get a COVID-19 booster shot.

The endorsement, following a unanimous vote by a panel of CDC advisors earlier in the day backing a third dose of a Moderna or Pfizer mRNA COVID vaccine, now means everyone over the age of 18 is eligible for a booster.

According the ACA FAQ 50, health plans now must covered vaccines administered to the expanded group.

Here is a link to the CDC’s weekly interpretation of its COVID statistics.

In other news / the “more”:

  • The Department of Health and Human Services announced today that “Today, the Biden-Harris Administration unveiled details about the establishment of a new federal advisory committee, the Ground Ambulance and Patient Billing (GAPB) Advisory Committee. As mandated through the No Surprises Act, the GAPB Advisory Committee will be charged with providing recommendations to the Secretaries of Health and Human Services (HHS), Labor, and Treasury on ways to protect consumers from exorbitant charges and balance billing when using ground ambulance services. * * * Learn more about the GAPB Advisory Committee and the Federal Register Notice – PDF.”
  • Beckers Hospital News reports that “Insurers need more evidence of the clinical benefit of Biogen’s controversial Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm before they start paying for it, Bloomberg reported Nov. 18. Bloomberg surveyed 25 of the nation’s largest insurers, and none of them deemed the drug “medically necessary.” Most indicated they view the drug as experimental and said they needed to see more evidence on the drug’s ability to slow cognitive decline.”
  • Govexec tells us that “About 90% of NASA employees have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccination, according to agency data, but about 1,150 workers are seeking an exemption to President Biden’s governmentwide mandate.”
  • mHealth Intelligence informs us that “The number of outpatient visits after hospital discharges remained stable during the COVID-19 pandemic but telehealth use for these visits increased, suggesting that telehealth was a substitute for in-person care rather than an addition, a study published in JAMA Health Forum revealed.”
  • The Wall Street Journal provides an overview of currently available and near future COVID treatments.

Midweek Update

David Ermer–ACA, COVID treatment, COVID-19, COVID-19 vaccine, OPM, U.S. Healthcare–
Photo by Josh Mills on Unsplash

From the Delta variant vaccine front, the New York Times reports

The Food and Drug Administration is aiming to authorize booster doses of Pfizer-BioNTech’s coronavirus vaccine for all adults as early as Thursday, a move that would expand the number of Americans eligible for additional shots by tens of millions, according to people familiar with the agency’s plans.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s independent committee of vaccine experts has scheduled a meeting for Friday to discuss data on the booster dose’s efficacy and safety. If both the F.D.A. and the C.D.C. sign off this week, they will have acted strikingly quickly — a little more than a week after Pfizer asked for authorization of boosters for everyone 18 and older.

Under that scenario, any adult who received a second dose of the vaccine at least six months earlier would be officially eligible to get a booster as soon as this weekend. The F.D.A. is expected to rule without consulting its own expert panel, which has met frequently during the pandemic to review vaccine data and make a recommendation ahead of a regulatory decision.

Moderna is expected to soon submit its own request for the F.D.A. to broaden eligibility for its booster. But for now, every adult could get the Pfizer booster, according to people familiar with the planning.

From the Delta variant research front, the National Institutes of Health has announced that

Lung autopsy and plasma samples from people who died of COVID-19 have provided a clearer picture of how the SARS-CoV-2 virus spreads and damages lung tissue. Scientists at the National Institutes of Health and their collaborators say the information, published in Science Translational Medicine, could help predict severe and prolonged COVID-19 cases, particularly among high-risk people, and inform effective treatments.

From the Delta variant vaccine mandate front, Govexec tells us that

The White House will not back down from next week’s deadline for virtually all federal employees to prove they are vaccinated against COVID-19, despite calls for a delay.  The federal workforce has until Nov. 22 to provide documentation demonstrating they are inoculated or to request an exemption under an executive order issued by President Biden. 

From the opioid epidemic front, the Washington Post informs us that

The U.S. drug epidemic reached another terrible milestone Wednesday when the government announced that more than 100,000 people had died of overdoses between April 2020 and April 2021. It is the first time that drug-related deaths have reached six figures in any 12-month period. * * *

The new data shows there are now more overdose deaths from the illegal synthetic opioid fentanyl than there were overdose deaths from all drugs in 2016.

Fentanyl is many times more powerful than morphine, leading to more frequent fatal overdoses. It is increasingly laced into other drugs, such as cocaine, and counterfeit pills, killing some who consume it unknowingly.

During the worst of the pandemic, more users were alone, reducing the chances that other users or bystanders could call first responders in the event of an overdose, experts have said. * * *

The number of opioid prescriptions issued by health-care providers has declined sharply as the crisis continues.

Addiction preys on young and middle-aged adults, who make up the bulk of those with drug-related substance use disorder.

Compounding the problem is the fact as related by Sam Quinones in his recent book the Least of Us that while a lethal dose of heroin takes about 15 minutes to kill a person, a lethal dose of fentanyl will take a minute or two to do so. That’s hardly enough time to administer naloxone which can pull people back from the brink of death. The FEHBlog wishes that Pfizer and Merck could develop a pill to cure substance abuse.

From the Open Season front, Reg Jones in Fedweek offers thoughts on how to use the ongoing federal benefits open season to the readers’ advantage.

From the No Surprises Act front, Healthcare Dive reports that

A key sticking point [stemming from the tri-agencies’ independent dispute resolution interim final rule] is the arbitration process, and how the qualifying payment amount (QPA) — determined by a plan’s median in-network contracted rate for a geographic area — is used to arrive at rates for out-of-network providers.

The Association of Air Medical Services filed a lawsuit in federal [district] court [for the District of Columbia, No. 1:21-cv-03031] challenging the rules Tuesday, claiming reliance on a QPA strays from Congress’ intent when passing the law that “no single statutory factor receives special weight” in the arbitration process.

As the FEHBlog previously noted, the Texas Medical Association has filed a similar lawsuit in the Lone Star State.

Encouragingly, Healthcare Dive adds that

The rules guiding the arbitration process are a form of consumer protection, 63 organizations representing patients, consumers, unions and employers said in a Tuesday letter.

An over reliance on out-of-network charges, particularly among Wall Street-backed providers, extracts maximum costs from patients, employers and health systems, thus driving up premiums and contributing to ever-rising healthcare spending in America, they said.

“As outlined in the interim final rule, it is only by reinforcing the QPA as the overriding and primary factor for determining final payment that the No Surprises Act can achieve the $17 billion in cost savings outlined by the Congressional Budget Office,” the groups wrote.

Amen

Also from the NSA front, the tri-agencies and OPM released an interim final rule implementing NSA Section 204’s burdensome yet aggregated prescription drug and healthcare cost reporting requirements imposed on health plans. The accompanying fact sheet explains

Summary of the November 17, 2021 IFC

This IFC requires plans and issuers in the group and individual markets to submit certain information on prescription drug and other health care spending to the Departments annually, including:

General information regarding the plan or coverage;

Enrollment and premium information, including average monthly premiums paid by employees versus employers; 

Total health care spending, broken down by type of cost (hospital care; primary care; specialty care; prescription drugs; and other medical costs, including wellness services), including prescription drug spending by enrollees versus employers and issuers;

The 50 most frequently dispensed brand prescription drugs;

The 50 costliest prescription drugs by total annual spending;

The 50 prescription drugs with the greatest increase in plan or coverage expenditures from the previous year; 

Prescription drug rebates, fees, and other remuneration paid by drug manufacturers to the plan or issuer in each therapeutic class of drugs, as well as for each of the 25 drugs that yielded the highest amount of rebates; and 

The impact of prescription drug rebates, fees, and other remuneration on premiums and out-of-pocket costs.

The IFC provides that plan sponsors, issuers, and FEHB carriers generally will be required to submit this information aggregated at the state/market level, rather than separately for each plan. To ensure that the Departments and OPM are able to conduct meaningful data analysis and identify prescription drug trends, the IFC further provides uniform standards and definitions, including for identifying prescription drugs regardless of the dosage strength, package size, or mode of delivery.

Applicability Date and Comment Period

The CAA requires plans and issuers to begin submitting the required information to the Departments by December 27, 2021, and to submit this information by June 1 of each year thereafter. However, the Departments have announced that they will exercise discretion to provide temporary deferral of enforcement with regard to the December 27, 2021 and June 1, 2022 deadlines, and that they will not initiate enforcement action against a plan or issuer that submits the required information for 2020 and 2021 by December 27, 2022. OPM also will allow its FEHB carriers to report information for 2020 and 2021 by December 27, 2022.

Comments on this IFC are due at 5 p.m. on January 24, 2022.

Before long, health plans, and especially FEHB carriers, will be spending most of their time reporting data to the government.

Tuesday’s Tidbits

David Ermer–CDC, Congress, COVID treatment, COVID-19, Federal employment benefits, OPM, Rx coverage, Telehealth–
Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

From Capitol Hill, we learn that “U.S. Reps. Diana DeGette (D-CO) and Fred Upton (R-MI) today introduced their highly anticipated, bipartisan Cures 2.0 legislation that some leading health care organizations are calling a potential “game changer” in how the U.S. conducts biomedical research going forward.” Here’s a link\ to a Fierce Healthcare article on the bill.

From the Food and Drug Administration front —

  • The Wall Street Journal reports that “Pfizer said it asked U.S. health regulators to authorize its oral Covid-19 drug for use in high-risk patients, putting the pill on a path that could make it available for people to take at home by the end of the year.  Clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration would give patients and doctors an easy-to-use treatment to keep people out of the hospital early in the course of the disease.” Moreover, “Pfizer Inc. is licensing its experimental Covid-19 antiviral to a global health organization in an effort to make the pill more readily available to people in low- and middle-income countries. Under the licensing agreement, the United Nations-backed Medicines Patent Pool will work with other drugmakers to manufacture the pill for use in 95 countries, including in sub-Saharan Africa, Pfizer and the nonprofit said Tuesday.”
  • The agency announced that authorizing “marketing of EaseVRx, a prescription-use immersive virtual reality (VR) system that uses cognitive behavioral therapy and other behavioral methods to help with pain reduction in patients 18 years of age and older with diagnosed chronic lower back pain. “Millions of adults in the United States are living with chronic lower back pain that can affect multiple aspects of their daily life,” said Christopher M. Loftus, M.D., acting director of the Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices in the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health. “Pain reduction is a crucial component of living with chronic lower back pain. Today’s authorization offers a treatment option for pain reduction that does not include opioid pain medications when used alongside other treatment methods for chronic lower back pain.”

From the Delta variant vaccine mandate front, Reason informs us that

The ping-pong ball has been drawn, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is the winner. All of the various state, industry, and union challenges to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) mandating large employers to require vaccination or regular testing and masking of employees will be consolidated into a single proceeding in the Sixth Circuit.

Given that challenges had been filed in all twelve regional circuits, and there are over three-dozen parties, this will be one bear of a case. Red states and employer groups initially filed in the more conservative circuits, including the Fifth Circuit which issued a stay on Friday, arguing that OSHA’s action was unlawful. Blue states and progressive groups responded by filing challenges in more liberal circuits, alleging that OSHA’s ETS is too lax. Each side was trying to increase the chances that the case would be consolidated on favorable turf by increasing the number of favorable circuits in the lottery draw.

Today the Labor Department referred the case to the Joint Panel on Multidistrict Litigation which conducted the lottery. The Sixth Circuit’s case presenting the legality of the OSHA ETS is Kentucky v. OSHA, No 21-4031. Bloomberg adds that “Although the Fifth Circuit temporarily halted the rule before the case was transferred, the Sixth Circuit will have the authority to modify or lift that order.” The case ultimately is expected to be resolved at the Supreme Court.

From the Centers for Disease Control front

  • The CDC’s National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP) has created a website full of “the links to access select information from NCCDPHP on health equity and racial/ethnic disparities.”
  • The CDC also has made available a pre-diabetes risk test for consumer use along with suggestions on how to deal with this condition.

From the federal employee benefits front, Federal News Network informs us

Some same-sex spouses of deceased federal employees and retirees will have another shot at earning survivor benefits from the federal government, the Office of Personnel Management announced this week.

A new notice, scheduled for publication in the Federal Register Wednesday, describes how widows or widowers who meet a specific set of criteria can apply for federal survivor benefits that they were previously ineligible for or, in some cases, denied.

OPM also has created an online “support center” for federal retirees. Check it out.

From the prescription drug pricing front, Healthcare Dive tells us that

Price hikes taken last year by AbbVie on its anti-inflammatory drug Humira increased U.S. healthcare spending by $1.4 billion, an amount unsupported by evidence showing any new health benefits, the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review said in a new report.

Humira, which treats rheumatoid arthritis and other diseases, was one of nine high-cost drugs singled out by ICER for large price increases without corresponding data proving greater effectiveness or new clinical uses.

Humira’s net price rose 9.6% in 2020, the watchdog group said in its report. The increase in net price, which reflects what insurers pay after rebates, actually exceeded AbbVie’s hike to the drug’s list price, a reversal of what usually happens during negotiations with drugmakers.

STAT news adds that

The findings, which appear amid ongoing national turmoil over the cost of prescription drugs, mark the third time that ICER has attempted to identify price hikes on big-selling drugs for which no new clinical evidence was offered. The exercise has underscored a debate over the value of medicines and the extent to which price hikes occur beyond medical inflation, even after rebates are counted.

At the same time, however, ICER also noted that overall net prices for prescription drugs in the U.S. market declined in the past several years, and even wholesale price increases have not exceeded the broader inflation rate. This helped restrain health insurance premiums, which benefited patients, although not necessarily in relation to specific medications.

Finally an intriguing telehealth tidbit from mHealth Intelligence

The number of outpatient visits after hospital discharges remained stable during the COVID-19 pandemic but telehealth use for these visits increased, suggesting that telehealth was a substitute for in-person care rather than an addition, a study published in JAMA Health Forum revealed.

Friday Stats and More

David Ermer–AHRQ, COVID treatment, COVID-19, COVID-19 testing, COVID-19 vaccine, Mental health care, OPM, Telehealth–

Based on the Centers for Disease Control’s COVID Data Tracker and using Thursday as the first day of the wee, here is the FEHBlog’s weekly chart of new COVID cases this year:

New cases plateaued this week. Weekly new COVID hospitalizations continue their down trend. For the latest week, the number of new admissions was 5,025 compared to a peak of 16,478 in the first week of 2021.

The number of COVID-related deaths continues it decline according the FEHBlog’s chart:

Distribution and administration of COVID vaccines was up sharply the past two weeks. At least one million doses were administered daily last week.

Here’s a link to the CDC’s weekly interpretation of its COVID statistics. Notably,

As of November 4, 2021, 426.7 million vaccine doses have been administered. Overall, about 222.6 million people, or 67% of the total U.S. population, have received at least one dose of vaccine. About 193.2 million people, or 58.2% of the total U.S. population, have been fully vaccinated.* About 21.5 million additional/booster doses in fully vaccinated people have been reported. As of November 4, 2021, the 7-day average number of administered vaccine doses reported (by date of CDC report) to CDC per day was 1,510,524, a 55.8% increase from the previous week.

The best news is Pfizer’s announcement of a successful trial of antiviral pill to tame early COVID.

  • PAXLOVID™ (PF-07321332; ritonavir) was found to reduce the risk of hospitalization or death by 89% compared to placebo in non-hospitalized high-risk adults with COVID-19
  • In the overall study population through Day 28, no deaths were reported in patients who received PAXLOVID™ as compared to 10 deaths in patients who received placebo
  • Pfizer plans to submit the data as part of its ongoing rolling submission to the U.S. FDA for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) as soon as possible

The Merck pill that Great Britain approved this week and the FDA will consider this month had the following reporting efficacy in its trial —

  • At the Interim Analysis, 7.3 Percent of Patients Who Received Molnupiravir Were Hospitalized Through Day 29, Compared With 14.1 Percent of Placebo-Treated Patients Who were Hospitalized or Died

The FEHBlog points this out to illustrate the strength of the Pfizer pill not to downplay the Merck pill.

The public health strategy for defeating COVID always has been a combination of testing, drugs, and vaccines. Nobody expected the vaccines to lead the pack, but the FEHBlog is grateful that testing and drugs finally are catching up to the wonderous vaccines. You combine these new drugs with rapid at home tests like the recently FDA approved FlowFlex on top of the vaccines, and you are left with endemic COVID in the FEHBlog’s view. As the FEHBlog is not a medical expert, let’s close this section with a squib from STAT News:

The development of oral medicines that can be used to treat Covid early on could blunt the impact of the pandemic.

Nahid Bhadelia, the founding director of the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases Policy & Research at Boston University, called oral antiviral pills “incredibly important” because existing treatments such as monoclonal antibodies must be given intravenously or as shots.

“With an oral antiviral, patients have more time and greater access to a treatment that will keep them out of the hospital,” Bhadelia said. “But the promise of oral antivirals will only be recognized if they’re available at your local pharmacy, and you can afford it, and you can get the test that tells you that you’re positive for Covid, so you can actually take advantage of this drug. So, the promise is there, but the rest of the pieces need to come together.”

From the tidbits department —

Morning Consult reports that

  • 72% of U.S. adults who have used telehealth said they’ve accessed virtual care through their regular provider or health plan, while another 17% have gotten care through a direct-to-consumer platform and 11% have used both types of services.
  • 53% of U.S. adults said they’d rather use in-person health care than telehealth moving forward, but that share fell to 45% among those who have used telehealth in the past.
  • Among the challenges for on-demand telehealth is getting coverage for the services, as traditional payers and providers roll out their own virtual care options.

The HHS Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research reports that

The Lehigh Valley Health Network (LVHN) used an AHRQ initiative to expand treatment for opioid use disorders in Pennsylvania. As a result, primary care physicians are now using medication-assisted treatment to care for their patients with opioid use disorders.  This new practice has been a success; as of fall 2021, 75 percent of patients who initiated treatment have returned in the following calendar month to continue treatment. With addiction treatment, this number of returning patients represents a major improvement, as most patients traditionally end treatment quickly.

With eight hospitals and numerous health centers, physician practices, rehabilitation locations, and other outpatient locations, LVHN serves patients in seven eastern Pennsylvania counties. LVHN used AHRQ resources to integrate treatment for opioid use disorder into primary care practice.

“In one visit, a patient can get his diabetes and blood pressure medications, plus his medication for opioid use disorder, without feeling the judgement of going to an addiction specialist,” noted Gillian A. Beauchamp, M.D., LVHN emergency physician. “When you’re sitting in a primary care waiting room, nobody knows why you’re there, so you don’t feel the stigma you might in another setting of care.”

Bloomberg tells us that

Even though the [COVID pandemic] upheaval increased risk factors for suicide like financial stress, the number of Americans who took their own lives decreased by 3% in 2020, the Centers for Disease Control’s statistical group reported this week

Suicides had increased steadily this century before peaking in 2018 with 48,000 annual deaths. That number declined slightly in 2019 and continued to drop in 2020, to less than 46,000, according to the CDC’s provisional data. In April, when shutdowns were most severe, the U.S. saw the lowest number of suicides in any month of 2020, 14% below the previous year’s total that month.

Federal News Network reports

In an ongoing effort to inject more young talent into the federal workforce, the Office of Personnel Management is out with yet another new hiring policy.

The latest policy, which OPM will publish as an interim rule Friday, is designed to help agencies more easily recruit and hire recent college graduates into administrative and professional positions in the federal government.

The new hiring policy means agencies can noncompetitively appoint qualified and eligible college graduates to permanent career positions at or below the General Schedule 11 level, OPM said. In a blog post on the new policy, OPM Director Kiran Ahuja said recent gradates have a chance to earn up to $72,000 a year under this new authority.