Midweek update
From inside the Beltway, Roll Call tells us
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Rochelle Walensky is looking to reorganize the agency in the wake of an external review of the CDC’s COVID-19 response. * * *
“For 75 years, CDC and public health have been preparing for COVID-19,” Walensky said, “and in our big moment, our performance did not reliably meet expectations.”
The plan aims to achieve a “more cohesive and customer centric structure,” by implementing new programs and procedures to work more quickly and ensure more accountability. Walensky plans to establish an executive council to oversee the CDC’s progress on specific goals, consolidate various points of access for external stakeholders and establish a new equity office.
STAT News adds
Outside experts expressed enthusiasm — though some of it tempered — for the changes Walensky is proposing.
Jay Varma, who spent 20 years at CDC before becoming director of the Cornell Center for Pandemic Prevention and Response at Weill Cornell Medicine, applauded many of the points Walensky stressed, particularly her promise to reform the culture of the agency and build up the capacity of its staff to respond to emergencies. Over the past two decades or so, Varma told STAT, public health agencies like the CDC have become increasingly bureaucratic.
“If your culture is not aligned entirely with what your mission is, it doesn’t matter how good the strategy is. It doesn’t matter what your org charts are. It is all about the workforce culture,” he said.
But Varma warned effecting change in the agency’s culture will be challenging.
Speaking of change, Fierce Healthcare informs us
A dramatic pickup in the pace of change for payers in the last year has created new priorities for health plan leaders, a new survey has found.
The survey, conducted by payment integrity solution HealthEdge, reached more than 300 health plan leaders. Common themes, per a report of the survey results, included the move to newer systems amid a digital transformation, rising demand for real-time data access and the promise of interoperability.
Some of the biggest threats facing health plans are new regulations, growing consumer expectations, competition and the transition to value-based payment strategies. The top two challenges are managing costs and driving operational efficiencies, which were lower on the list of priorities just last year. Tied in third place are member satisfaction and alignment of IT and business needs.
There are several drivers of these hurdles. Post-pandemic, there are notably more claims. Long delays in care have also led to rising costs, and outdated systems have required significant investment to keep up with demand. Having a solid digital baseline can help payers eliminate manual, repetitive processes, the report suggested. Payers also believe increasing interoperability and improving claims accuracy helps alleviate administrative costs.
From the Rx coverage front, BioPharma Dive reports
The Food and Drug Administration on Wednesday approved a powerful new treatment for people with an inherited blood condition called beta thalassemia, clearing a personalized gene therapy developed by the biotechnology company Bluebird bio. * * *
Its approval is a milestone in a number of other respects, too. Beta thalassemia, a disease that in severe cases requires regular blood transfusions for life, has for years been marked as a target for gene therapy. Bluebird’s treatment, which will be sold as Zynteglo, is the first of several in development to reach market in the U.S., giving patients an option that could free them from those transfusions and their associated side effects.
STAT News adds
Bluebird has set the price of Zynteglo at $2.8 million per patient, making it one of the most expensive medicines ever sold in the U.S. And that price tag doesn’t include the cost of the lengthy hospitalization for patients getting the therapy.
A person with beta thalassemia incurs total health care costs that average $6.5 million over their lifetime, or 23 times higher than the general population, said Obenshain, making the case for Zynteglo’s cost effectiveness. Earlier this year, the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, an independent drug-pricing analysis group, said Zynteglo would be cost effective up to a price of $3 million.
Bluebird will be asking insurers to pay for Zynteglo entirely up front, but the company will also return up to 80% of the cost if patients need to restart blood transfusions before two years.
“All the commercial insurers we’ve engaged with have expressed a really strong interest in this,” said [Bluebird CEO Andrew] Obenshain, of Bluebird’s outcome-based payment proposal.
From the research and studies front —
- “Infectious disease expert Dave Wessner reports for Forbes from the 24th International AIDS Conference, where researchers shared ways that Covid vaccine development might help the development of a vaccine for AIDS.”
- The National Institutes of Health announced “Scientists funded by the National Institutes of Health have developed a same-day test to identify abnormal fetal chromosomes. The Short-read Transpore Rapid Karyotyping (STORK) test can detect extra or missing chromosomes (i.e., aneuploidy) using samples collected from prenatal tests, such as amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling, as well as tissue obtained from miscarriage and biopsies from pre-implantation embryos produced using in vitro fertilization (IVF). * * * Overall, the study shows that STORK is comparable to standard clinical tests and has many advantages. STORK is faster, providing results within hours versus several days. It is also cheaper, with the study team estimating STORK to cost less than $50 per sample, if 10 samples are run at the same time, or up to $200 if a sample is run on its own. STORK can also be done at the point-of-care for a patient, eliminating the need to ship a sample to a clinical laboratory. According to the study authors, STORK may be particularly useful in identifying genetic causes of miscarriage. Currently, professional societies only recommend genetic testing if a person has had multiple miscarriages, but an easy, cost-effective test like STORK can potentially be offered after the first miscarriage. STORK can also be used to streamline the IVF process. Currently, embryos must be frozen while genetic tests are run and analyzed before implantation. STORK’s ability to provide results within hours can presumably eliminate this freezing step, which saves time and cost. More work is needed to validate STORK, but if results continue to show promise, STORK could improve the quality of reproductive healthcare.”
- The National Cancer Institute announced “For people with advanced cancer, severe side effects from treatment often force them to the hospital or the emergency room. Although these time-consuming and, quite often, expensive hospital trips potentially could be prevented by better communication about symptoms between patients and their doctors, the reality is that such discussions don’t typically happen as frequently as they should. Now, a new study shows that community health workers (CHWs) may help bridge this communication gap in cancer care. In the study, having a CHW directly consult with people newly diagnosed with advanced cancer or cancer recurrence, including assessing their symptoms and helping them with advance care planning, substantially decreased hospitalizations and emergency room visits.”
- Fierce Healthcare reports “Musculoskeletal conditions are a massive source of health spending—accounting for $420 billion in 2018—and a new report from [Cigna’s] Evernorth aims to pinpoint where health plans could cut down on costs.”
- Health IT Analytics tells us “New research published in JAMA Internal Medicine shows that an artificial intelligence (AI)-based cognitive behavioral therapy intervention for chronic pain (AI-CBT-CP) had similar outcomes to standard CBT-CP, which could result in increased access and reduced costs.”
From the government contract front, Federal News Network reports that
As the travel industry — and prices — recover from COVID-19, the General Services Administration is giving federal employees a little more leeway on hotel costs for official travel.
The base daily traveling allowances will rise slightly from $155 per day in 2021 to $157 per day in 2022. Per diem lodging rates will account for that rise, increasing from $96 per night to $98. Meals and incidental expenses will not change from their current range of $59-$79 per day.
For feds who already have an idea of their travel plans for fiscal 2023, GSA included a new calculator tool that will allow them to search by city, state, zip code or a map to determine the exact amount of their per diem.
Experience-rated FEHB plan carriers must subject employee lodging and miscellaneous expenses to the GSA’s per diem caps when seeking government contract reimburses for those expenses.