Thursday Miscellany

From Washington, DC,

  • Govexec informs us,
    • “The Senate on Thursday made progress on advancing bipartisan spending bills for fiscal 2025, though members of both parties acknowledged significant divisions remain between the two sides. 
    • “The chamber’s Appropriations Committee approved three of the 12 annual funding measures Congress must pass each year—those funding the departments of Agriculture and Veterans Affairs, as well as the legislative branch—in unanimous, 27-0 votes. While that marked a significant step forward in the fiscal 2025 process and an accomplishment that has eluded the panel’s House counterpart—which has advanced its bills to date only along partisan lines—the Senate could not come to a bipartisan agreement on how much money to allocate for the remaining nine funding measures.”
  • and
    • “The Senate on Wednesday voted 55-37 to confirm Anne Wagner as the third member of the Federal Labor Relations Authority, finally bringing the agency’s political leadership to nearly full strength.
    • “Similar to the National Labor Relations Board’s role overseeing collective bargaining in the private sector, the FLRA governs labor-management relations at federal agencies, with a three-member board that settles unfair labor practice complaints and other disputes between unions and management.” * * *
    • “Federal employee unions rejoiced at the news that the FLRA’s board was now fully staffed. The last 18 months of deadlock between [Colleen Duffy] Kiko and FLRA Chairwoman Susan Tsui Grundmann has meant the board could only rule in noncontroversial cases.”
  • The American Hospital Association News lets us know,
    • “The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions held a hearing July 11 on medical debt. The AHA submitted a statement for the hearing that highlighted how the quality of insurance coverage is a driver of medical debt, saying that coverage for many patients is either insufficient or unavailable. The AHA discussed hospital and health system efforts offering financial and other assistance, and that hospitals absorb billions of dollars in losses for patients who cannot pay their bills, mainly due to inadequate commercial insurance coverage. To address the issue, the AHA urged Congress to restrict the sale of high-deductible health plans to individuals with the ability to afford the associated cost-sharing; prohibit the sale of health-sharing ministry products and short-term limited-duration plans that go longer than 90 days; and lower the maximum out-of-pocket cost-sharing limits, among other changes.”
    • That’s nuts, and it’s worth adding that all of the witnesses, except for one, were from the creditor side. Here’s a link to the American Enterprise Institute testimony.
  • The AHA News adds,
    • “The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services July 10 announced there will be 133 participants representing 772 practices for its new Making Care Primary Model. Participants in this voluntary model are from Colorado, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina and Washington. The model, which began July 1 and will run through 2034, seeks to improve care management and care coordination, enable primary care clinicians to partner with health care specialists, and use community-based connections to address patients’ health needs as well as their health-related social needs such as housing and nutrition.”
  • and
    • “The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services recently released results of an air ambulance qualifying payment amount calculations audit on Aetna Health in Texas. The report found that Aetna used practices that did not comply with federal requirements, and strongly recommended corrective actions. Specifically, the report found that Aetna failed to “properly calculate the QPA by using claim paid amounts instead of contracted rates, and counting each claim as its own contracted rate, even when the claims were for the same amounts for the same item or service and to the same provider of air ambulance services.” Aetna may also be subjected to future audits.”

From the public health and medical research front,

  • The Washington Post reports,
    • “Research into chronic conditions affecting women is significantly lacking, and the National Institutes of Health and other agencies should do more to investigate issues that lead to worse medical treatment for women, a new report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine says.
    • “Women are disproportionately affected by chronic illnesses, including Alzheimer’s disease and depression, according to the study requested by NIH’s Office of Research on Women’s Health and published Wednesday.
    • “But inadequate research in women’s health “hinders a comprehensive understanding of the impact on women” of these and other chronic illnesses, the report’s authors write. Further research is needed, particularly for Black women, who are more likely to die of a chronic illness than White women, the study says.”
  • and
    • “Nearly 1 in 10 people infected with the coronavirus during pregnancy developed long covid, according to a study published Thursday in the journal Obstetrics and Gynecology.
    • “Thursday’s study, which highlights the consequences of the virus during pregnancy, suggests long covid is more prevalent among people infected while pregnant than in the population overall. As many as 7 percent of Americans report having symptoms associated with long covid, according to a 2022 report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Some surveys suggest a far higher incidence of long covid in the general population.” * * *
    • “I was initially surprised at the prevalence of long covid in this population,” said Torri Metz, one of the study’s lead authors and a maternal-fetal medicine specialist at University of Utah Health. “It really drew my attention to the fact I need to have this on my radar when I am seeing patients.”
  • NBC News informs us,
    • “A key mystery behind one of the most common autoimmune diseases may finally have an answer.
    • “Researchers at Northwestern Medicine and Brigham and Women’s Hospital say they’ve discovered a root cause of lupus, a disease that affects hundreds of thousands of people in the U.S. 
    • “Scientists have long suspected that a person’s genetics or hormones may predispose them to lupus, and that the disease may be triggered by environmental factors like a previous viral infection or exposure to certain chemicals.
    • “Now, a study published Wednesday in the journal Nature outlines a clear pathway for how the disease likely develops, pointing to abnormalities in the immune systems of people with lupus.”
  • Neurology Advisor points out,
    • “The prevalence of stroke has increased by 14.6% from 2011 to 2022 among individuals aged 18 to 44 and 15.7% among those aged 65 and younger in the United States, according to a report published in Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
    • “Researchers assessed trends in stroke prevalence between 2011 and 2022, using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a state-based surveillance system administered to noninstitutionalized civilian adults in the US in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). * * *
    • “Age-standardized prevalence of stroke increased from 2.7% in 2011 to 2013 to 2.9% in 2020 to 2022, marking a 7.8% (95% CI, 4.9%-10.8%) increase in overall stroke prevalence. The researchers noted the highest stroke prevalence (7.7%; 95% CI, 7.5%-7.9%) among individuals aged 65 and older and the lowest prevalence (0.9%; 95% CI, 0.8%-1.0%) among individuals aged between 18 and 44 years.
    • “Stroke was observed to be highest (5.3%; 95% CI, 4.7%-5.9%) among the American Indian or Alaska Native group and lowest among the Asian group (1.6%; 95% CI, 1.2%-2.0%).
    • “With regard to educational level, individuals with a high-school diploma had the highest stroke prevalence (5.2%; 95% CI, 4.8%-5.4%) and those with a college degree or higher had the lowest stroke prevalence (1.7; 95% CI, 1.6%-1.8%).”
  • STAT News relates,
    • “Researchers from the American Cancer Society and International Agency for Research on Cancer estimate 40% of all cancer cases in the United States in people 30 and up were due to “potentially modifiable risk factors,” including cigarette smoking, physical inactivity, consumption of processed meat, viruses, excess body weight, alcohol drinking and more. Data was from 2019 in order to avoid the influence of the pandemic, when cancer diagnoses declined because of delayed care. The results were published in the American Cancer Society’s journal, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.” * * *
    • “In the study, alcohol was associated with seven cancers: oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, colorectum, and female breast, as well as squamous cell carcinoma in the esophagus, and hepatocellular carcinoma in the liver. Beyond those, “there is accumulating evidence” that alcohol can cause other cancers, such as pancreatic cancer, said lead author Farhad Islami, senior scientific director of cancer disparity research at ACS (which funded the study). 
    • “The increased risk is because of the alcohol in alcoholic beverages, not the type of beverage,” he said. A standard alcoholic beverage in the United States has about 14 grams of pure ethanol. That looks like one 12-ounce serving of 5% ABV beer, a 5-ounce serving of 12% ABV wine, 8-10 ounces of 7% ABV hard seltzer, or 1.5 ounces of 40% ABV liquor. Research suggests the higher a person’s consumption, the higher the risk of cancer.”
  • Here is a link to the NIH Director’s blog titled this week “Sequencing Technique Detects Earliest Signs of Genetic Mutations Underlying Cancer, Aging, and More”
  • The National Institutes of Health announced,
    • “Early findings from a small clinical trial provide evidence that a new cellular immunotherapy approach may be effective in treating metastatic solid tumors. In the trial, researchers from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) genetically engineered normal white blood cells, known as lymphocytes, from each patient to produce receptors that recognize and attack their specific cancer cells. These initial findings are from people with metastatic colorectal cancer who had already undergone multiple earlier treatments. The personalized immunotherapy shrank tumors in some patients and was able to keep the tumors from regrowing for up to seven months. The findings were published July 11, 2024, in Nature Medicine.” * * *
    • “Colon cancer is just one of many solid tumors the researchers are studying. The trial is still ongoing and includes patients with different types of solid cancers.
    • “It’s just the very beginning of converting normal lymphocytes into cells capable of treating the common solid cancers,” Dr. Steven A. Rosenberg, a co-leader of the study, said. “What this study shows is that it’s possible. Once you know it’s possible, you work to improve it.”
  • Here is a link to the All of Us Program’s latest Medical Minutes.

From the U.S. healthcare business front,

  • Beckers Hospital Review tells us,
    • “As more older adults opt for Medicare Advantage plans, reimbursement fights between hospitals and insurers are increasingly centered around those contracts.
    • “According to data shared with Becker’s by FTI Consulting, there were 20 reimbursement disputes between hospitals and insurers that made headlines somewhere in the country during the second quarter, the same amount as the first quarter and slightly lower than the same period in 2023, when 24 contract disputes were reported in national or local media.
    • “Notably, a record number of Q2 disputes (15 of 20) involved Medicare Advantage plans, and 30% of disputes failed to reach a timely agreement, meaning tens of thousands of patients were left without in-network coverage. FTI has tracked media reports regarding negotiations over reimbursement rates during each quarter since early 2022.”
  • BioPharma Dive reports,
    • “On Thursday, the pharmaceutical giant [Pfizer] said it is advancing a once-daily version of an experimental and closely watched medicine called danuglipron. Pfizer based the decision on results from a small clinical trial of healthy volunteers that’s been evaluating how the body interacts with danuglipron. Studies designed to find the optimal dose of the medicine are scheduled for later this year.
    • “Umer Raffat, an analyst at the investment firm Evercore ISI, speculates that with its update Thursday, Pfizer is “likely buying time” to see more data from a backup once-daily drug it’s been developing. “Candidly, the trial that just wrapped up never answered the question on” what dose would be effective enough to compete, he wrote in a note to clients.
    • “In that backdrop, the judicious thing to do from [the] Pfizer perspective was to not overcommit — and that’s exactly what they did today,” Raffat added. They “didn’t kill [danuglipron], they said it may move forward, but not right to [Phase 3].”
  • Beckers Payer Issues adds,
    • “As insurers continue to face major financial pressures related to covering weight loss drugs, many are steering more patients toward bariatric surgery to achieve similar results.
    • “Insurance companies are seeing that they’re getting more reliable outcomes and savings in the long run if they pay for someone to have bariatric surgery,” Christine Ren Fielding, MD, told Becker’s. Dr. Ren Fielding is a professor of surgery at NYU School of Medicine, the director of the NYU Langone Weight Management Program and chief of the system’s division of bariatric surgery.
    • “If you’re a responder to appetite control caused by a GLP-1, then there’s another treatment option that will do exactly the same thing: bariatric surgery. That includes Lap-Band, sleeve gastrectomy, and gastric bypass,” she said. “Bariatric surgery is the old-fashioned way. Insurers are now putting up barriers for people who want to be covered for GLP-1s and taking down barriers for people who want to have surgery.”
  • STAT News informs us,
    • “The Food and Drug Administration rejected Novo Nordisk’s weekly insulin for the treatment of diabetes in a rare setback for the pharmaceutical giant.
    • “The agency has requests related to the manufacturing process and the use of the insulin specifically in type 1 diabetes patients, Novo said in a statement Wednesday. The company, which had submitted an application for the drug for both type 1 and type 2 patients, said it does not expect to be able to fulfill the requests this year.”