Friday Factoids

Photo by Sincerely Media on Unsplash

From Washington, DC —

  • The White House kicked off its Friday with a bunch of new healthcare measures, none of which impact the FEHB. Roll Call offers a useful overview of the measures.
  • Here is a link to the related Affordable Care Act FAQ 60, which discusses the No Surprises Act measures, which are explained in the separate White House press release. To maintain one’s sanity, read the No Surprise Billing section of that press release before reading the FAQ. That will help you decide the relevance of the FAQ to your work.
  • In combing through the various press releases, the FEHBlog did run across this link to an HHS report to Congress on the No Surprises Act, which may be worth a gander.
    • “This first report focuses largely on establishing a baseline and a framework for further evaluation. The report details key trends in factors that will be important to evaluate NSA effects, including the implementation and impacts of state surprise billing laws already in effect; trends in market consolidation and concentration; the impact of market consolidation and concentration on prices, quality, and spending; and trends in OON billing. This report also describes a conceptual framework for considering the healthcare market effects of NSA, as well as describing potential methodologic approaches (and their limitations) for estimating these effects. Subsequent reports will implement these approaches.”
  • STAT News reports
    • “Medicare is planning to send $9 billion in lump-sum payments to more than 1,600 hospitals that participate in a drug discount program [known as 340B] after the Supreme Court found the program underpaid them for prescription drugs, the agency announced on Friday.
    • “To pay for the restitution, Medicare would slash all hospitals’ payments for other items and services by 0.5% for the next 16 years.”
    • The FEHBlog paraphrases the Bible, “First it giveth, then it taketh away.”
  • The Society for Human Resource Management tells us
    • “The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has postponed the deadline for employers to file their 2022 EEO-1 reports, which list workforce demographic data, including race and sex.
    • “An announcement on the EEOC’s website explained: “The EEOC is currently completing a mandatory, three-year renewal of the EEO-1 Component 1 data collection by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). Accordingly, the EEOC has updated the tentative opening of the 2022 EEO-1 Component 1 data collection to the Fall of 2023.”
    • “A more precise date was not available. Previously, the tentative deadline for filing was in mid-July.”

Let’s wrap us this Friday with potpourri:

  • Politico interviews the income president of the American Medical Association Jesse Ehrenfeld, MD.
  • Benefits Pro discusses Rx optimization programs.
  • Health IT Analytics explains “How Elevance Health and MVP Health Care are leveraging data analytics. The two payers share how they leverage data analytics, predictive modeling, and data quality frameworks to improve outcomes for members.”
  • MedPage Today points out
    • “As research interest in the therapeutic potential of psychedelics has grown — with academic centers popping up across the country, and compounds already in developmen — the FDA recently caught up, issuing a draft guidance on managing clinical trials of these drugs.
    • “The draft guidance was released on June 23, as one of the largest U.S. psychedelic conferences was underway. It outlined the agency’s views on best practices in clinical trial design for psychedelic drugs — including psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), and methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) — in the treatment of medical conditions, including psychiatric or substance use disorders.
    • “In an email to MedPage Today, an FDA spokesperson called psychedelics “a very active and challenging area of drug development.”
    • “As an emerging area of drug development, there is limited experience as to the configuration of programs that may support approval of a psychedelic drug,” the spokesperson wrote. “The guidance presents foundational constructs that all sponsors, including academic sponsor-investigators, studying the therapeutic potential of psychedelic drugs should consider.”
  • The Wall Street Journal questions whether people should be judgmental about other people who lose weight with the new generation of weight loss drugs.
    • “Elizabeth Owen didn’t let her husband’s comments dissuade her from taking Ozempic. (John Owen, 60, who had recommended his wife continue to exercise and eat healthy to lose the weight, says he was just telling her to do what he would have done in her situation.) At 5’2” and 142 pounds, she was the heaviest she had ever been, despite regular workouts with a personal trainer.
    • “Owen, who lives in Orlando, Fla., says she has been embarrassed to tell her personal trainer about taking Ozempic. She did tell a good friend, who told her the drug would make her sick.
    • “She has lost 34 pounds so far and takes a small maintenance dose. Recently, John’s doctor advised him to lose weight and prescribed Wegovy, which he’s taking. 
    • “Friends and family also are starting to ask about her treatment in a more positive way, she says. 
    • “They’re curious because I’m maintaining the weight loss,” she says. “A year later, they all want to know why.”