The FEHBlog hopes his readers enjoyed their Fourth of July weekend. The FEHBlog certainly did.
From Washington, DC —
- FedWeek informs us
- “The House version of the annual defense authorization bill would require DoD and OPM to conduct a “comprehensive review of the civilian workforce on FEHB to ensure that all family members and dependents who are currently receiving benefits are in fact eligible.”
- “The language, inserted as an amendment to a bill that could come to floor voting in the upcoming weeks, would be the most concrete response to date regarding an issue that has been the subject of repeated warnings from OPM’s inspector general’s office and most recently from the GAO: ineligible persons being covered in the program as family members.”
- FEHBlog note — The largest internal control problem with FEHB eligibility stems from the fact that OPM does not take advantage of the HIPAA 820 electronic enrollment roster, which allows health plan carriers to reconcile premium to headcount. For example, if the carrier finds via the HIPAA 820 that it is not receiving premiums on a self and family enrollee, then the outcome may be disenrolling the individual and their covered family members in a fair way. In the FEHBlog’s view, it does not make sense to move forward with a family member eligibility audit until the HIPAA 820 transaction is operational in FEHB. That is the most logical first step.
- Federal News Network provides us with background on OPM’s new employee assistance program guidance. In the FEHBlog’s opinion, OPM should team up EAPs with FEHB plans in order to better coordinate their respective coverages.
- Fedweek also explains for the benefit of federal and postal employees how to continue FEGLI coverage into retirement.
- Healthcare Dive relates
- “The CMS is proposing to cut Medicare reimbursements to home health agencies by 2.2% next year, or $375 million less than providers received in 2023, according to draft regulation released Friday.
- “The agency said the proposed rule includes a 2.7% payment bump that’s offset by a 5.1% cut related to the Patient-Driven Groupings Model, which aimed to better sort patients into different payment categories by clinical need and other factors.
- “The reimbursement changes also reflect an estimated 0.2% increase due to an updated fixed-dollar loss ratio, according to regulators.”
From the public health front —
- CBS News reports
- “Nearly 1 in 4 U.S. adults and older teens had still not caught COVID-19 by the end of last year, according to new estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, while 77.5% had antibodies from at least one prior infection. The figures are based on the final batch of results from the agency’s nationwide studies of antibodies in Americans ages 16 and up. * * *
- “Virtually every American ages 16 and older — 96.7% — had antibodies either from getting vaccinated, surviving the virus or some combination of the two by December, the CDC now estimates. The study found 77.5% had at least some of their immunity from a prior infection. * * *
- Rates were similar among men and women. Black and White people also have similar prior infection rates, between 75% and 80%.
- Among other racial and ethnic groups, Asian Americans had the smallest proportion of people with antibodies from a prior infection, at 66.1%, while Hispanic people had the highest, at 80.6%.
From the Rx and medical devices coverage front —
- BioPharma Dive points out
- “Moderna on Wednesday said it’s submitted applications to regulatory agencies around the world in a bid to win approval of a new vaccine to fight respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV, in older adults.
- “The company filed with regulatory agencies in Europe, Switzerland and Australia and began a rolling submission to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the vaccine, which is currently known as mRNA-1345. Future applications are planned for other nations as well.
- “Moderna’s submissions come two months after the FDA approved the first RSV vaccine, developed by GSK. The agency cleared a second RSV shot from Pfizer weeks later. Both products are approved for use in patients who are at least 60 years old, the same group Moderna aims to treat.”
- Forbes reports
- “On Wednesday, medtech giant Abbott announced that its new leadless pacemaker system, Aveir DR, has been approved by the FDA. This is the first time the FDA has given a thumbs up to a device of this type for two different chambers of the heart, which opens up this technology to nearly any patient who needs a pacemaker.
- “From a clinical perspective, we know that leadless pacing offers a number of important advantages to patients in terms of getting away from the complications related to traditional pacemakers,” says Leonard Ganz, a cardiologist and Abbot’s chief medical officer for cardiac rhythm management. “This will expand the number of patients who can benefit from leadless pacing many, manyfold,” he tells Forbes.” * * *
- “Although pacemakers have been life-changing for millions of people, they do carry downsides, explains Ganz, in particular, risk of infection both from the surgical procedure needed to implant them as well as the leads themselves should their insulation become compromised. Leadless pacemakers, by contrast, are much smaller, don’t require surgical implantation and have no wires connected to the heart. Instead, they are injected using a catheter in a vein and placed directly in the heart in a way that allows for removal if need be. All of these factors significantly reduce the risk of complications.
- “The first leadless pacemaker, manufactured by Medtronic, was cleared by the FDA in 2016. Abbott’s first leadless pacemaker, the Aveir VR, was approved by the FDA in March 2022. [In contrast to the new Abbott device, b]oth of these products only work in a single chamber of the heart. About 80% of the patients that require a pacemaker need shocks in two cardiac chambers in order to keep the desired heart rhythm.”
- The New York Times discusses “food noise,” which the new weight loss drugs dissipate.
- “The active ingredient in Ozempic and Wegovy is semaglutide, a compound that affects the areas in the brain that regulate appetite, Dr. Gabbay said; it also prompts the stomach to empty more slowly, making people taking the medication feel fuller faster and for longer. That satiation itself could blunt food noise, he said.
- “There’s another theoretical framework for why Ozempic might quash food noise: Semaglutide activates receptors for a hormone called GLP-1. Studies in animals have shown those receptors are found in cells in regions of the brain that are particularly important for motivation and reward, pointing to one potential way semaglutide could influence cravings and desires. It’s possible, although not proven, that the same happens in humans, Dr. Hwang said, which could explain why people taking the medication sometimes report that the food (and, in some cases, alcohol) they used to crave no longer gives them joy.”
From the U.S. healthcare business front
- Segal Consulting delves into health plan prior authorization practices.
- The Wall Street Journal reports that “Some hospitals that spent big on nurses during the pandemic are now short on cash; Distressed institutions are closing unprofitable services, selling assets to avoid default on debts.” Ruh-roh!
- Forbes reports
- “Rite Aid reported a quarterly loss of more than $306 million as the drugstore chain grapples with the loss of customers from its Elixir pharmacy benefits business as executives work to turn around the struggling drugstore chain.
- “Rite Aid, which has closed more than 140 unprofitable stores in the last two years, reported a fiscal first-quarter loss of $306.7 million, or $5.56 per share, for the period ended June 3, 2023. That compares with a loss of $110.2 million, or $2.03 per share, in last year’s first quarter.”
From the fraud, waste, and abuse front, HealthTech explains how the Justice Department is using advanced analytics to combat healthcare fraud.
From the medical research front, the National Institutes of Health announced that “The first clinical trial of a three-month TB treatment regimen is closing enrollment because of a high rate of unfavorable outcomes with the investigational course of treatment.” The FEHBlog appreciates NIH’s transparency.