From the FEHB front, Federal News Network provides an update on the GAO report on FEHB that was mentioned in yesterday’s post.

The Office of Personnel Management, the agency that runs the health insurance program for federal employees and retirees, does not have a clear way to identify and remove FEHB enrollees’ family members who are erroneously part of the program, according to the Government Accountability Office.

“The longer OPM delays its efforts to establish a monitoring mechanism to identify and remove ineligible members from FEHB, the more ineligible members and related improper payments in the program may continue to accrue, costing the program millions, or up to approximately one billion dollars per year, according to OPM’s own estimate,” GAO said in a Jan. 9 report.

OPM said it has received the final report and is planning to flesh out a larger response soon.

OPM’s Healthcare and Insurance Office “will be evaluating potential action items, including timelines, and will provide a comprehensive response to GAO within 180 days upon evaluation of the recommendations,” OPM spokesperson Viet Tran told Federal News Network.

From the public health front,

January is Cervical Cancer Awareness Month, and Patient Engagement HIT tells us

Nearly one in 10 women have never had a common cervical cancer screening, like a Pap test, with issues such as limited health literacy and poor access to care getting in the way, according to a Harris Poll conducted on behalf of BD (Becton, Dickinson and Company).

These trends are more common in racial minorities, with Black and Hispanic women being more likely to say they have never had a Pap test. Compared to the 6% of White women who said they’ve never had a Pap test, 12% of Hispanic women and 13% of Black women said the same. * * *

receipt of Pap tests is extremely low, the survey of 872 women ages 18 to 64. Overall, 71 percent of respondents have delayed getting a Pap test, with 15 percent saying their last OB/GYN check-up was three years ago.

Although not explicitly explored in the survey, it’s key to note that timeline aligns with the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic when access to primary and preventive care stalled. * * *

The good news is, around three-quarters of all respondents, regardless of race, said they have resolved to get back on track with their primary and preventive care, including Pap tests and HPV screenings, in the new year.

But doing so will require some leg work from the healthcare industry, which should note some patient health literacy and convenient care access snags getting in the way.

Even though nearly every respondent said they are knowledgeable about women’s health (91 percent), a whopping 81 percent admitted they don’t know how often they should get a Pap test and 51 percent said they were unaware of how often they should get an HPV test.

The survey also found consumer support for an at-home screening test. Kaiser Permanente and MD Anderson Center offer their views on at-home screening, and MD Anderson reminds us

The best protection for both men and women against HPV and related cancers[, i.e. cervical cancer,] is the HPV vaccine. All males and females ages 9-26 should get the HPV vaccine. It is most effective when given at ages 11-12. Unvaccinated men and women ages 27-45 should also talk to their doctor about the benefits of the vaccine.

MedPage Today reports

Adhering to healthy eating patterns was associated with lower risk of total and cause-specific mortality, a prospective cohort study with up to 36 years of follow-up showed.

Among 75,230 women from the Nurses’ Health Study and 44,085 men from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, those who scored in the highest quintile for healthy eating patterns recommended by the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGAs) had a 14% to 20% lower risk of total mortality versus those in the lowest quintile, reported Frank Hu, MD, PhD, of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston, and colleagues in JAMA Internal Medicine opens in a new tab or window.

The pooled multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios of total mortality with four healthy eating patterns were (P<0.001 for trend for all):

• Healthy Eating Index 2015 (HEI-2015): HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.79-0.84)
• Alternate Mediterranean Diet (AMED): HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.79-0.84)
• Healthful Plant-Based Diet Index (HPDI): HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.89)
• Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI): HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.77-0.82)

This lower risk was consistent across all racial and ethnic groups.

NIH’s NIAAA Director provides tips for a successful dry January. Good luck to all those who made this resolution because

Taking a break from alcohol for an entire month provides one with an opportunity to assess their patterns of alcohol consumption and how it affects them physically and mentally. It gives a person a chance to cultivate alternatives for relaxing, socializing, and coping with stress. As a result, many people experience benefits such as improved sleep and waking without the fatigue, malaise, and upset stomach of a hangover. Some also find that without the extra calories due to alcohol they lose weight. Participants in Dry January also describe positive effects on their relationships. And an added bonus is saving money.

STAT News brings us up to date on mpox.

From the Omicron and siblings front,

• Becker’s Hospital Review provides some geographic details on the current winter’s Covid surge.

• The National Institutes of Health announced “The antiviral treatment Paxlovid reduced the risk of hospitalization or death from SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants in older adults by 44%. Wider use of Paxlovid may help temper a winter surge of COVID-19, as some other treatments are no longer effective.”

• Politico reports on progress being made to end the Covid public health emergency later this year.

From the Food and Drug Administration front,

• STAT News interviews the FDA Administrator Robert Califf on the Congressional investigative report concerning the Aduhelm fiasco.

• The FDA announced that “In 2022,  the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research approved 37 new drugs never before approved or marketed in the U.S., known as “novel” drugs, as noted in our annual New Drug Therapy Approvals report. We also approved drugs in new settings, such as for new uses and patient populations.” 

From the Rx coverage front, Drug Channels delves into major prescription benefit manager formulary exclusions lists for 2023.

From the medical research front, the National Institutes of Health announced, “Researchers developed a blood test that could detect Alzheimer’s disease-promoting compounds in the blood long before symptoms emerged. The findings may lead to early diagnostic tests for Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases.”

From the U.S. healthcare business front

• Fierce Healthcare’s lead article on the ongoing JP Morgan healthcare conference concerns CVS’s Heath’s foray into primary care.

• Healthcare Dive adds, “CVS Health is exploring an acquisition of value-based primary care chain Oak Street Health, according to a Monday Bloomberg report. The two are in ongoing talks and could reach a deal within weeks that values Oak Street at more than $10 billion including debt, according to Bloomberg, which cited sources familiar with the matter a deal.”

• Healthcare Dive informs us that “Teladoc Health shared an early look at its financial results at JPMorgan’s healthcare conference on Monday, indicating between $633 million and $640 million in revenue for the fourth quarter, a little higher than consensus estimates from analysts. The virtual care giant projected total 2022 revenue between $2.4 billion and $2.41 billion, according to its regulatory filing. Teladoc’s direct-to-consumer mental health unit, BetterHelp, is expected to contribute roughly $1 billion of that topline.”

• STAT News reports, “Rising labor costs have been the main financial concern for hospitals over the past year, but those costs have peaked and are now a lot lower, according to hospital system executives who presented during the J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference.”

From the post-Dobbs front, STAT News tells us about telehealth provider reactions to the Justice Department’s announcement last week permitting abortion drugs to be sold by mail and the FDA’s opportunity for pharmacies to sell those drugs.

From the Supreme Court front, STAT News relates

The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a bid by Pfizer to use a copay-assistance program to help Medicare beneficiaries pay for an expensive heart drug. The company argued the program would not violate kickback laws, a controversial issue that forced numerous drugmakers to pay large fines. Last July, an appeals court panel upheld a lower court ruling that such programs would violate federal law, but Pfizer filed a petition to the Supreme Court that contended such interpretations are “staggeringly overbroad.” Pfizer maintained there was no “corrupt intent” in offering assistance and that Medicare beneficiaries would be denied needed medicines they would otherwise not be able to afford.

It’s up to Congress to fix this problem.