From Capitol Hill, the Wall Street Journal reports
A top Senate Democrat said that his party planned to introduce an omnibus spending bill Monday, aiming to pressure Republicans to accept a deal or risk an alternative that would freeze government spending at current levels for the full year and cut off the ability to reallocate money in military and other programs.
Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D., Vt.) said that the measure would provide military funding at the level Congress is authorizing in its separate defense policy bill—some $858 billion, or roughly a 10% increase—while also paying for what he called a needed increase to nondefense programs.
“This is a reasonable path forward, and I suggest my Republican friends take it,” Mr. Leahy said. * * *
If no deal is reached as the end of the year approaches, lawmakers have said they might need to fall back to a so-called continuing resolution, which funds the government at current levels. Various lawmakers have floated stretching funding into early 2023 or for the full fiscal year, which ends in September.
The path forward was unclear, as neither House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) nor Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) announced votes on an omnibus bill for next week.
The Journal adds,
House lawmakers on Thursday passed a defense policy bill [discussed in yesterday’s FEHBlog post] that authorizes U.S. military leaders to purchase new weapons and increase pay for troops, and lifts a requirement for members of the military to get vaccinated against Covid-19. * * * The legislation is expected to pass the Senate by the end of next week before heading to President Biden’s desk for his signature.
STAT News tells us
Key decision makers in Congress are closer than they’ve been in years to revamping the way the government regulates some of the diagnostic tests that patients use to make crucial decisions about their health care [due to the Theranos fiasco].
If the VALID act passes, the FDA wouldn’t regulate every single clinical test, but only tests considered “high risk” to patients, where the risk to patients of an inaccurate result could cause serious or irreversible harm.
One example would be a test for breast cancer that could lead a patient to have a mastectomy, Boiani said. Another would be a genetic test that could determine which cancer treatment patients receive, said Jeff Allen, the president and CEO of Friends of Cancer Research.
From the Federal Employee Benefits Open Season front, Tammy Flanagan writing in Govexec and Drew Friedman writing in Federal News Network offer last minute decision-making tips.
Investment News provides advice on income adjusted Medicare premium issues.
Most Medicare beneficiaries will pay the standard Part B premium of $164.90 per month in 2023, down slightly from this year’s monthly premium of $170.10. Medicare Part B covers doctors’ fees and out-patient services. Coupled with a huge 8.7% cost-of-living adjustment in Social Security benefits next year, most retirees will enjoy larger monthly net Social Security benefits after automatic deductions for their Part B premiums in 2023.
But about 8%, or about 5 million, of the nearly 63 million Medicare beneficiaries will pay more than the standard monthly premium for both Part B and Part D prescription drug plans based on their income. My husband and I are among them.
For 2023, single beneficiaries with incomes of $97,000 or more and married couples with joint incomes of $194,000 or more pay a Medicare premium surcharge, officially known as an income-related monthly adjustment amount, or IRMAA. The thresholds increased from $91,000 and $182,000, respectively, in 2022, meaning some beneficiaries may avoid IRMAA surcharges altogether in 2023 or pay less than this year due to the inflation adjustments of the income tiers that trigger those surcharges.
In other health benefits news, Insurance News Net informs us
The average per-employee cost of employer-sponsored health insurance rose by 3.2% in 2022, according to Mercer’s 2022 National Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Plans, released today.
US employers expect a sharper increase of 5.4% in 2023 — and faster cost growth in the years ahead seems likely
For now, most employers are prioritizing enhancing benefits to attract and retain workers over cost-cutting; enhancements range from adding perks to improving healthcare affordability
Mental health remains a top concern of employers and employees – and virtual mental healthcare is proving key to improving access to services
From the Rx development and coverage front, we have three reports from STAT News —
- Well, this government action didn’t take long. STAT News relates “The Food and Drug Administration announced Thursday it had amended the emergency use authorizations for the updated Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 boosters, to allow their use in children aged 6 months and older.”
- Also according to STAT News, “A year ago, the [Purchaser Business Group on Health] coalition created Emsana Health that, in turn, hatched the EmsanaRx pharmacy benefit manager. [Beginning March 1, 2023,] EmsanaRx will run the technology to ensure prescriptions handled by Cuban Cost Plus Drugs are paid and fulfilled, and report all this information back to the [self-funded] employer. In exchange, EmsanaRx will take a flat 1.5% fee for legal, administrative, and data sharing services, but not charge more than $3 for each insurance claim and will pass along any rebates collected.”
- Finally from STAT News, “Medicare is willing to reevaluate its coverage of Alzheimer’s drugs in light of a new therapy, called lecanemab, that has shown potentially more promising patient data than its controversial predecessor, Aduhelm, according to the official who oversees the program. “I can’t speak to any specifics, but just to say that our door is really open,” Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said Thursday at the Milken Institute Future of Health Summit when asked about how the agency will approach lecanemab. “We will look at it as new data comes.”
From the public health front —
- The Washington Post reports
An outside group [the Reagan Udall Foundation] that was asked to examine problems at the Food and Drug Administration in the wake of an infant formula crisis this year offered a scathing indictment of the agency’s structure and culture and recommended major restructuring, including possibly breaking up the agency so that oversight of the food system gets more attention. * * *
In a statement, FDA Commissioner Robert M. Califf said he will review the report and make decisions about the future of the agency with input from experts inside and outside the FDA.
- The Congressional Research Service issued an “In Focus” report on “Regulating Reproductive Health Services After Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.”
- Health Payer Intelligence tells us
Overall, major health outcomes measures are trending in a negative direction, according to America’s Health Rankings Annual Report for 2022.
The Annual Report examines 23 measures to assess health outcomes trends nationwide, including measures for eight chronic conditions. The data for these measures primarily represented 2021 outcomes, but some measures drew from 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2022.
A Morning Consult online survey conducted in October 2022 informed the results as well as racial and ethnic subpopulation data and a total of 80 national and state measures to assess the state of healthcare in the US.
Based on the findings, the coronavirus pandemic has continued to have ripple effects on healthcare. The top three major trends in health outcomes are:
- Increased drug deaths
- Increased non-medical drug use
- Increased premature death