From Washington, DC,

• Per a Congressional press release,
  • “U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) today applauded the enactment of the bipartisan Maternal and Child Health Stillbirth Prevention Act, a bill [(H.R. 4581)] he championed alongside U.S. Rep. Ashley Hinson (R-Iowa) and U.S. Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.). The law will help curb infant mortality by enabling evidence-based stillbirth efforts to qualify for federal funding.
  • “Stillbirth prevention researchers and advocates will now have more resources to advance their work. Especially given modern medical and technological capabilities, no family should have to endure the heartbreak of a stillbirth. Many thanks to everyone – Iowa organizations in particular – who’s had a hand in advancing our commonsense bill into law. Today’s win will have a domino effect for expectant families nationwide, for years to come,” Grassley said.  
  • “Today is a huge milestone in our fight to end stillbirth, the unexpected loss of a baby after more than 20 weeks of pregnancy. I am proud to have worked with so many incredible advocates, many of whom have endured the heartbreak of stillbirth, to bring this vital legislation across the finish line and expand federal resources for stillbirth prevention. I thank President Biden for signing this bipartisan legislation into law, and I will continue my work to improve maternal health care access for more healthy moms and healthy babies,” Hinson said. “
• Fierce Pharma lets us know,
  • “Thursday, the Senate unanimously the bipartisan Affordable Prescriptions for Patients Act [(S. 150)], which looks to limit the number of patents drugmakers can assert in litigation on individual biological products. The bill aims to fight “patent thicketing,” a tactic the branded drug industry uses to delay or thwart competition.
  • “Patent thicketing occurs when drug companies stack secondary drug patents to create a complex web of intellectual property that’s hard for generic or biosimilars developers to navigate. AbbVie, for example, was able to keep its top-selling immunology drug Humira from U.S. competition for two decades by leveraging a web of 250 patents, patient access group Patients for Affordable Drugs Now (P4ADNow) said in a press release.
  • “This long-overdue legislation would promote competition and lower prices for patients without standing in the way of innovation, and I urge my colleagues in the House to pass it as soon as possible,” bill sponsor Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said in a statement. 
  • “Reining in patent thickets would create $1.8 billion in taxpayer savings over the span of a decade, the Congressional Budget Office has forecast.”

• AXIOS reports
  • “The Biden administration on Wednesday rolled out its latest election-year initiative on women’s health, proposing standards that would require the hospital industry to invest billions in maternity care improvements to remain in Medicare. * * *
  • “Hospitals would have to keep basic resuscitation equipment available in labor and delivery rooms, document maternal health training for staff and have written policies for transferring patients to other hospitals.
  • “All hospitals offering emergency services — even if they lack an obstetrics unit — would be required to have proper protocols and supplies for emergency deliveries and other needs.
  • “Hospitals not following these standards could eventually be booted from the Medicare and Medicaid programs.”

• The American Hospital Association News adds,
  • “An infographic released by the University of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center highlights the decline of maternity care access in rural counties across the U.S. from 2010-2022, finding that nearly 59% of rural counties did not have any hospital-based obstetric services as of 2022.
  • “Researchers categorized rural counties based on population as micropolitan (having a town of 10,000-50,000 residents) and non-core (without a town of at least 10,000 residents). They found that micropolitan counties with hospital-based obstetric care declined from about 81% in 2010 to nearly 74% in 2022. Noncore counties declined from 34% in 2010 to nearly 26% in 2022.”

From the public health and medical research front,

• The University of Minnesota’s CIDRAP tells us,
  • “Respiratory illness viruses as a whole remain at low levels, but many parts of the countries are experiencing consistent increases in COVID-19 activity, which has been trending upward from very low levels, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said today in its latest updates.
  • “Test positivity, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations—the main markers the CDC uses to gauge virus activity—are all rising, especially in both seniors and the western states. * * *
  • “The percentage of ED visits for COVID, considered an early indicator, rose 23.5% last week compared to the week before. Levels were higher in the West and the South than in the rest of the country.” * * *
  • “The dashboard at WastewaterSCAN a national wastewater monitoring system based at Stanford University in partnership with Emory University, shows SARS-CoV-2 detections at the high level, especially in the West, South, and East, with an upward trend over the past 21 days.
  • “In its latest variant update, posted on July 6, the CDC said the proportion of KP.3 detections continues to rise, up from 31.3% to 36.9% over the 2-week monitoring period. KP.3 is one of the JN.1 offshoots with mutations that allow it to better evade immunity from earlier infection or vaccination.” 

• Per Fierce Pharma,
  • “Trials have already shown that Novo Nordisk’s semaglutide can cut the risk of cardiovascular events and kidney disease. Now a study from the University of Oxford indicates that the company’s semaglutide type 2 diabetes drug Ozempic can reduce the risk of dementia compared with another popular diabetes medicine.
  • “The research—which was designed to demonstrate if Ozempic could cause neurologic problems—showed instead that it produced a 48% decline in dementia when compared to Merck’s type 2 diabetes drug Januvia (sitagliptin).” * * *
  • “Prior studies have determined that diabetics have a greater risk of developing dementia. Those with type 2 diabetes are at an elevated risk for Alzheimer’s, according (PDF) to studies cited by the Alzheimer’s Association.” * * *
  • “Elsewhere, Lilly’s GLP-1/GIP therapy tirzepatide—which is the compound used to manufacture its type 2 diabetes drug Mounjaro and obesity treatment Zepbound—was recently shown to lower blood pressure. Researchers are still studying whether many of these benefits accrue from the treatment or from the weight loss they provide.”

• The National Institutes of Health announced,
  • Using health data from almost 213,000 Americans who experienced reinfections, researchers have found that severe infections from the virus that causes COVID-19 tend to foreshadow similar severity of infection the next time a person contracts the disease. Additionally, scientists discovered that long COVID was more likely to occur after a first infection compared to a reinfection. The study, funded by the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) Initiative, is published in Communications Medicine.
  • “About 27% of those with severe cases, defined as receiving hospital care for a coronavirus infection, also received hospital care for a reinfection. Adults with severe cases were more likely to have underlying health conditions and be ages 60 or older. In contrast, about 87% of those who had mild COVID cases that did not require hospital care the first time also had mild cases of reinfections.
  • “Reinfections were defined as having occurred at least two months after a first infection. They were found to occur most frequently when omicron variants were circulating in late 2021 and early 2022. Waning immunity and increased exposure to the coronavirus, including the highly-infectious variants, likely accounted for the uptick.
  • “Scientists also discovered that regardless of the variant, long COVID cases were more likely to occur after a first infection compared to a reinfection.”

• The Wall Street Journal reports,
  • “Human lifespan has a limit and we might have reached it.
  • “S. Jay Olshansky, who studies the upper bounds of human longevity at the University of Illinois Chicago, believes people shouldn’t expect to live to 100. Most, he contends, will reach between 65-90.
  • “Biology is holding us back, Olshansky said. Human evolution favors growth and reproduction, not living to excessive ages. As people grow older, their cells and tissues accumulate damage. Breakdowns of one kind or another happen more frequently and get increasingly difficult to repair. Scientists believe there are likely many genes that affect lifespan. Aging is a complex process that isn’t well-understood.
  • “Olshansky knows his viewpoint isn’t popular. 
  • “The longevity business is booming. People are flocking to longevity meetings and taking compounds they hope will extend their lives. Investors are backing scientists researching techniques to reprogram cells to a younger state with the goal of restoring functions that diminish with age. Longevity influencers argue that if they can live long enough, scientific breakthroughs will keep them going indefinitely.” * * *
  • “Jan Vijg, chair of genetics at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in the Bronx, reached a similar conclusion from a different angle. He has studied the maximum verified age the oldest people died at in different countries. The maximum age at death increased gradually at least from the 1950s until the 1990s, when it appeared to plateau.
  • “He isn’t surprised that Jeanne Calment, a French woman who died in 1997 at 122, still holds the world record of the oldest verified age at death. There are now hundreds of millions more people who have reached old age under optimal conditions—benefiting from clean water, antibiotics, improved treatments for top killers such as heart disease and cancer, and healthier lifestyles. 
  • “If lifespan had no limit, some of those centenarians would have broken Calment’s record by now, he argued.” 
  • “It seems this is the end,” Vijg said.

From the U.S. healthcare business front,

• Beckers Clinical Leadership identifies the 94 emergency departments across our country that the Emergency Nurses Association has recognized “for their commitment to quality, safety and a healthy work environment.”

• Per Fierce Pharma,
  • “Even through an onslaught of biosimilar launches that began early last year, AbbVie’s big-selling Humira has been able to retain most of its lucrative market. Still, though, the drug’s star power is on the decline.
  • “Biosimilar manufacturer Samsung Bioeps has tracked the impact of Humira biosim launches in its latest market report, finding that Humira’s slice of the market has dropped to 82%.
  • “Sandoz’ Hyrimoz, under its Cordavis co-label, is responsible for “most biosimilar gains,” according to the report. Cordavis is CVS Health’s new biosimilar subsidiary, which launched with Hyrimoz as its first product.
  • “Back in April, CVS Caremark removed branded Humira from its national commercial formularies, causing Hyrimoz prescriptions to skyrocket, analysts at Evercore ISI noted at the time. Through April 25, Hyrimoz was responsible for 82% of Humira biosimilar prescriptions, IQVIA data revealed. The successful launch has so far pushed Sandoz to revenue gains of 6% during the first quarter.”

• The Wall Street Journal arranged for a palliative medicine doctor to write an essay about dying at home. It’s worth a look.
  • Research suggests that 70% of Americans want to die at home. More seem to be doing so, at least partly owing to the Covid-19 pandemic. In a study of where people died in 32 countries between 2012 and 2021, published in Lancet’s eClinicalMedicine in January, the authors found a rise in home deaths in most countries, including the U.S., during the pandemic, which they largely interpreted as progress.
  • The truth is more complicated. Now, 10 years into my career as a palliative medicine physician, I know that there is much more to a “good” death than its location. Presuming a home death is a success obscures important questions about the process: Did this person die comfortably? Did their caregivers have the resources and guidance they needed? Was dying at home a choice or simply the only option?