From Washington, DC

• The U.S. Office of Personnel Management recently posted new Postal Service Health Benefits Program FAQs concerning its May 2024 proposed rule supplementing existing guidance on that program. The public comment period on that proposed rule is next Monday June 24.
  • Here’s an FAQ on a point that the FEHBlog mentioned but he has not seen in any other publication:
    • While the proposed rule reflects that Medicare Part D-eligible annuitants and their Part D-eligible family members would be automatically group enrolled into the Part D EGWP, it reflects that they may choose to opt out of receiving prescription drug coverage through the PSHB Part D EGWP. This proposed rule provides, consistent with the statute, that the Part D EGWP offered by their PSHB plan is the only PSHB prescription drug benefit available for Part D-eligible PSHB annuitants and their Part D-eligible covered family members. As proposed, Medicare Part D-eligible annuitants and their family members who choose to opt out of or disenroll from the PSHB plan’s Part D EGWP would not have access to prescription drug benefits through their PSHB plan and would not pay a lower premium than those enrolled in the Part D EGWP. An individual who opts out of or disenrolls from the Part D EGWP would be allowed to enroll again during the next open season or an applicable Qualifying Life Event (QLE) if they wish.

• Federal News Network tells us,
  • “While years in the making, the Office of Personnel Management’s upcoming plans to try to cut down on unneeded health insurance costs will also arrive to open arms from the Government Accountability Office.
  • “Beginning in 2025, OPM is adding stricter eligibility requirements to try to root out ineligible enrollees in the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) program — something that’s been high on GAO’s radar for at least the last few years. A 2022 GAO report showed that OPM spends up to $1 billion each year on ineligible participants erroneously enrolled in FEHB.
  • “One of the biggest benefit systems in the country, and for decades, nobody checked these things,” Comptroller General Gene Dodaro told lawmakers on the House Oversight and Accountability Committee during a June 13 hearing. * * *
  • “Current FEHB eligibility determination and enrollment is highly decentralized and requires cooperation between nearly 100 employing offices responsible for determining eligibility and enrolling more than 8 million members,” OPM said in April. “If funded, OPM could extend this same central enrollment system to all FEHB enrollments, which would allow OPM to manage and make consistent all FEHB enrollments and remove individuals who cease to be eligible for the program.”
  • “OPM, as part of its fiscal 2025 budget request, is proposing legislation to build a centralized enrollment system for FEHB. With a central database, OPM would be able to more quickly address the problem and avoid the spending errors. That system, if it’s implemented, would be modeled after the centralized system OPM just recently built for the upcoming Postal Service Health Benefits program.”
    • FEHBlog note — While all of this is welcome progress, the most glaring, and as yet unresolved, internal control issue is that OPM reports enrollment and premiums to carriers separately rather than using the HIPAA standard electronic enrollment roster transaction 820 which would allow carriers to reconcile each enrollee with his or her premium payments. Carriers are entitled to this reconcilable information because they hold the insurance risk on these plans. Moreover, shouldn’t we make sure that the enrollee is paying the correct premium before checking family member eligibility?

• The New York Times reports,
  • “The U.S. surgeon general, Dr. Vivek Murthy, announced on Monday that he would push for a warning label on social media platforms advising parents that using the platforms might damage adolescents’ mental health.
  • “Warning labels — like those that appear on tobacco and alcohol products — are one of the most powerful tools available to the nation’s top health official, but Dr. Murthy cannot unilaterally require them; the action requires approval by Congress.”

• STAT News adds,
  • “His call to action on Monday was more strident, garnering praise from advocates of stricter social media controls, especially for young people. “Yes, this is a consumer product that is unsafe for children and teens,” wrote NYU social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, a strong proponent of limiting phone time, on X.
  • “But for several experts operating in this field, the type and extent of social media harm exacted on children isn’t quite as clear as Murthy seems to suggest. Indeed, said Michaeline Jensen, a psychologist at the University of South Carolina, Greensboro, there isn’t sufficient evidence to conclude social media is safe — but there isn’t enough to conclude the opposite, either.

• STAT News also lets us know,
  • “The Food and Drug Administration on Monday approved Merck’s new pneumococcal vaccine for adults 18 and older.
  • “The vaccine, which will be sold under the name Capvaxive, is designed to protect against pneumococcal pneumonia, which hospitalizes about 150,000 adults in the United States every year and kills about 1 in 20 who develop it, according to the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases. * * *
  • “Before Capvaxive can be put into use, it must receive a recommendation from the CDC. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which advises the CDC on vaccination policy, meets next week for one of its three regularly scheduled meetings. A draft agenda for the meeting shows that a vote on Capvaxive is scheduled for Thursday, June 27.”

• Per Fierce Healthcare,
  • “The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announced on Monday that is gearing up to end a program that offered financial assistance to providers impacted by the cyberattack on Change Healthcare.
  • “The agency said that the accelerated and advance payment program launched in response to the hack will end on July 12. The initiative sought to ease cash-flow disruptions that were caused by the cyberattack.

From the public health and medical research front,

• STAT News reports,
  • “The hope for many cancer patients who go through surgery is that they’ll be cured after the surgeon removes the tumor. The question that lingers is whether they got it all out — if the surgery happened in time before cancer cells scattered off of the primary tumor to seed unseen metastases or if some microscopic malignancy was left behind near the original cancer site.
  • “To answer this question, clinicians are increasingly turning to blood tests that detect circulating tumor DNA, known as ctDNA. The idea is that finding tumor DNA in the blood probably means that cancer cells are still growing somewhere in the body, even at a low level. These tests are starting to be used in a variety of cancers — and for the most part, clinicians agree that if the test is positive, the cancer will likely recur. The trouble is that scientists aren’t sure what should happen next.
  • “We are all recognizing that if a patient has detectable circulating tumor DNA, it’s not a question of if the cancer’s coming back, but when,” said Van Morris, a gastrointestinal medical oncologist at MD Anderson Cancer Center. “The field recognizes the power of this tool, but I think there remain many questions of how best do we utilize that in the day-to-day management of patients.”
  • “Some of those questions include whether clinicians should step up the intensity of treatment if patients are positive for ctDNA, whether they should step down treatment if patients are negative for ctDNA, or how long they should treat patients. And if you do any of these things, it’s still not clear if that would have any meaningful impact on patients’ overall survival or quality of life in most settings. The only way to answer these questions will be by confirming hypotheses in prospective randomized trials, which are ongoing.”

• Per BioPharma Dive,
  • “New data showcase promise, growing pains of CAR-T in autoimmune disease.
  • “While one expert described clinical trial results to date as “unprecedented,” reports of relapses in some patients drew questions about the therapies’ ultimate potential.”

• The Washington Post and Consumer Reports points out,
  • “Five diet changes that can help lower blood pressure.
  • “Adding potassium and cutting back on alcohol can help reduce the need for meds if you have hypertension, or even prevent it in the first place.”

• The Washington Post reports,
  • “Born last November, Fern had blood drawn from her heel for North Carolina’s mandatory newborn screening, which tested for more than 60 medical conditions. Nothing was found. That could have been the end of the story. Instead, Tiffany and her husband, Matthew Vogt, a physician and scientist in Durham, decided to take the nonprofit research institute RTI International up on a groundbreaking offer.
  • “Free of charge, parents in North Carolina can have experts conduct a more extensive scan and review their baby’s entire genetic blueprint for 200 different conditions. One is Pendred syndrome, a condition not covered by the standard, more limited newborn screening.
  • “Researchers in North Carolina and New York are studying whether this far more comprehensive approach can save lives and improve children’s health. Two decades after scientists sequenced the first human genome, the two studies reflect the rapid emergence of a new kind of health care called genomic medicine, spawned by that landmark achievement.
  • “Early results show that genome sequencing is identifying conditions not disclosed through the traditional newborn screening required by all 50 states. Since the study in North Carolina began in September 2023, researchers have examined the genomes of more than 1,800 babies; 40 were deemed likely to have medical conditions that were not previously diagnosed. One newborn was flagged as likely to have two previously undiagnosed conditions.
  • “Some of those were for potentially life-threatening conditions,” said Holly Peay, lead investigator for the Early Check program led by RTI International.
  • “Since launching the GUARDIAN program with its collaborators in September 2022, New York State has sequenced the genomes of more than 10,000 babies; 299 tested positive for one of the 450 conditions the state has focused on.
  • “For one child, it was even lifesaving,” said Wendy Chung, head of pediatrics at Boston Children’s Hospital, who is leading New York’s study.”

• The National Institutes of Health announced,
  • “The prevalence of chronic hypertension in pregnancy in the United States doubled from 2007-2021, but only about 60% of those with the potentially life-threatening condition were treated with antihypertensive medications, according to a National Institutes of Health (NIH)-supported study of nearly 2 million pregnancies. The study, which was funded by NIH’s National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), did not explore the reasons for the increase, but rising maternal age, growing obesity rates, and other factors likely played a role, according to researchers. The findings were published today in the journal Hypertension.
  • “These findings are deeply concerning because of the high rate of U.S. maternal mortality, which is linked to chronic hypertension in pregnancy,” said study lead Stephanie Leonard, Ph.D., an epidemiologist at Stanford University School of Medicine in California. “Despite the availability of safe and effective treatments for chronic hypertension, the study speaks to an urgent need for improvement in care for this serious condition.” * * *
  • “To manage hypertension during pregnancy, experts recommend that women check their blood pressure at home and keep it under control, visit with a doctor often, and take antihypertensive medications as prescribed.”

• Per a Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration press release,
  • “Researchers from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that among a cohort of 137,000 Medicare beneficiaries who experienced a nonfatal overdose in 2020, almost 24,000 (17.4%) experienced a subsequent nonfatal overdose, and about 1,300 (1%) died from overdose in the following year. Results were published today in JAMA Internal Medicine, identifying both effective interventions and significant gaps in care.
  • “People who have experienced one overdose are more likely to experience another,” said Miriam E. Delphin-Rittmon, Ph.D., HHS Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use and the leader of SAMHSA. “But we found that when survivors received gold-standard care such as medications for opioid use disorder and naloxone, the chances of dying from an overdose in the following year drop dramatically. In short, medications for opioid use disorder, opioid overdose reversal medications, and behavioral health supports save lives.”
  • “The study identifies effective, lifesaving interventions following initial nonfatal overdoses. The odds of dying from a subsequent lethal overdose decreased among cohort members who received methadone (58% lower odds), buprenorphine (52% lower odds), or behavioral health assessment or crisis services (75% lower odds). The risk of overdose mortality among those who filled a prescription for naloxone was also reduced by 30%.
  • “However, significant gaps in care were also noted. Only 4.1% of the cohort received medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), and only 6.2% filled a prescription for naloxone, commonly known as Narcan, despite these being gold-standard interventions. Beneficiaries receiving MOUD waited a mean of 72 days between their nonfatal overdose and receiving medication.”

• STAT News reports,
  • “E-cigarettes were about as effective at helping people quit smoking as the gold-standard pharmaceutical drug, varenicline, according to a clinical trial published Monday in JAMA Internal Medicine.
  • “The trial randomized 458 people who smoked daily and wanted to quit to receive either a nicotine-containing e-cigarette and placebo tablets, varenicline and an e-cigarette without nicotine, or a placebo tablet and a nicotine-free e-cigarette for 12 weeks. All three groups were also given intensive tobacco cessation counseling.
  • “After 26 weeks, roughly equal percentages of participants using varenicline and e-cigarettes — 43.8 percent and 40.4 percent, respectively — had stopped smoking. The difference in quit rates between the two groups was not statistically significant.
  • “The JAMA study is the first published randomized controlled trial to compare varenicline, also known as Chantix, directly to e-cigarettes. Several studies have demonstrated that e-cigarettes can help adults quit smoking. However, most studies have compared e-cigarettes to placebo alone, or to nicotine replacement therapy, such as patches and lozenges, which help smokers manage their withdrawal symptoms.
  • “The trial is likely to cause a stir within the tobacco-control community, which has been bitterly divided over the question of whether e-cigarettes are a help or hindrance for adults who smoke cigarettes, and whether they should be recommended by doctors as a way to kick a smoking habit. While countries like the United Kingdom actively encourage smokers to use these products to help them quit cigarettes, nations including the United States and Japan have been far more conservative. Backers of e-cigarettes say this study shows the U.K. has the right idea.”

From the U.S. healthcare business front,

• In Medicare Advantage STAR ratings news, Modern Healthcare tells us,
  • “Nonprofit health insurance companies historically have outperformed for-profit competitors on star ratings and could be disadvantaged when their rivals are boosted, but the Alliance of Community Health Plans doesn’t see a concern.
  • “It is equitable that plans that are going to have their scores recalculated for ’24 and have a change in their revenue have a chance to modify their ’25 bids because they were at a different place when they submitted it,” said Michael Bagel, associate vice president of public policy at the trade group for nonprofit insurers.
  • “Allowing only insurers that get increased scores to resubmit bids could provoke lawsuits, Meekins said. “There’s still the potential for legal challenges to that because there’s a bit of game theory that goes into the bid process and what you think other people are going to do,” he said.
  • “CMS has not said how it will handle star ratings for 2025, whether it will reinstitute the methods the courts overturned on technical grounds or whether it will appeal the Elevance Health and SCAN Health Plan decisions.”

• Beckers Hospital Review identifies “37 health systems with strong operational metrics and solid financial positions, according to reports from credit rating agencies Fitch Ratings and Moody’s Investors Service released in 2024.”

• Fierce Healthcare offers a special report naming “the top 10 nonprofit health systems by 2023 operating revenue.”

• MedCity News relates
  • “Retailers are facing several headwinds in healthcare in 2024. Walmart and Dollar General both recently ended healthcare endeavors, and CVS Health is reportedly looking for a private equity partner for Oak Street Health (which it acquired in 2023). VillageMD, which is backed by Walgreens, is shuttering numerous clinics.
  • “Still, Mary Langowski, executive vice president and president of U.S. healthcare at Walgreens Boots Alliance, sees a strong future for retailers in healthcare.
  • “I happen to be very bullish on the role of retail in healthcare and frankly, having a very central role in healthcare,” she said. “And part of that is because over 80% of people want health and wellness offerings in a pharmacy and in a retail setting. Consumers want the ease, they want the convenience of it. And those are important things to keep in mind, that demand is there.”
  • “Langowski, who joined Walgreens in March, made these comments during a Tuesday fireside chat at the AHIP 2024 conference held in Las Vegas. She added that what the industry is seeing is not an “evolution” of whether retailers will exist in healthcare, but a shift around what the “right model is going to be.” 

• The Washington Post notes,
  • “If your doctor can’t see you now, maybe the nurse practitioner can.
  • “Nurse practitioners have long been a reliable backstop for the primary-care-physician shortfall, which is estimated at nearly 21,000 doctors this year and projected to get worse.
  • “But easy access to NPs could be tested in coming years. Even though nearly 90 percent of nurse practitioners are certified to work in primary care, only about a third choose the field, according to a recent study.
  • “Health-care workforce experts worry that NPs are being lured toward work in specialty practices for the same reason that some doctors steer clear of primary care: money.”