From Washington, DC —

• Roll Call reports,
  • “House Republicans are planning to take up a short-term stopgap funding measure next month to avoid a partial government shutdown, Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., told members of his conference during a Monday night call, sources familiar with the conversation said. 
  • “The continuing resolution is expected to extend current funding until early December, giving lawmakers a few extra months past the Sept. 30 deadline to complete fiscal 2024 appropriations. McCarthy said Monday that he did not want to have a continuing resolution run up to the Christmas recess, sources said. 
  • “The speaker’s announcement, which came as little surprise, served as an acknowledgment that the clock had run out for completing appropriations on time for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1.”

• Govexec says,
  • “Although President Biden and congressional appropriators appear to be in accord on the White House’s plan to grant federal employees their largest annual raise in more than two decades in 2024, there is still work to be done to make it a reality.
  • “Biden first proposed an average 5.2% pay increase for civilian federal workers and members of the military next year when he unveiled his fiscal 2024 budget plan. That figure marks the highest annual pay increase federal employees have seen since President Carter authorized a 9.1% raise in 1980.
  • “And although the administration and Senate Democrats have been butting heads with GOP appropriators in the House on a variety of funding issues in recent months, neither the House nor the Senate have included language in their respective spending packages to overrule the pay raise plan.”
• The article explains the legal steps that the President must take this year to implement his pay raise plan.

• Federal News Network informs us,
  • “In another effort to try to usher young talent into the federal workforce, the Office of Personnel Management is proposing changes to decade-old parameters for the Pathways Program.
  • “The new proposed regulations from OPM, in part, look to expand eligibility for the recent graduates’ Pathways Program, to include individuals who may not have a college degree, but who have completed different “technical education programs.” By counting experience in the Peace Corps, AmeriCorps, Job Corps and the Registered Apprenticeship Program, OPM said it hopes to make the program overall more inclusive, and help agencies attract a broader, more diverse pool of early-career applicants.”

• Fierce Healthcare tells us,
  • “The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently published new changes to further advance health equity and increase participation under the ACO REACH model.
  • “National Association of ACOs President and CEO Clif Gaus said the changes will “satisfy many concerns and stabilize future participation.” * * *
  • “Currently, there are 132 participants under ACO REACH, a value-based care model that began in January and replaced the Direct Contracting Model. The new model pushes providers to form accountable care organizations, or ACOs, for fee-for-service Medicare enrollees, and allows for providers to take on more financial risk. Participants are required to implement a health equity plan identifying disparities in care.”

• A STAT News explains,
  • “The Inflation Reduction Act passed and signed into law a year ago attempts to deal with high drug prices paid by the U.S. government, allowing Medicare to negotiate the prices of some medicines after they have been on the market for years. (Industry would say it’s not negotiation but price-fixing.) But while the IRA is desperately needed — branded medicines cost 2.4 times more in the U.S. than in other developed countries, according to the RAND Corporation — there are ways in which it makes the situation worse.
  • “Here is the problem. The process of testing new experimental medicines takes a long time, sometimes a decade or more, and it is much longer for some objectives, such as preventing heart attacks, than others, like slightly extending the lives of terminal cancer patients.
  • “If one got to design a drug-pricing system from a blank slate, allowing drug prices to spike and then be cut after a few years would look less than ideal. It would be far better to set a lower price at the outset and not raise it but to allow a company to sell a drug for longer so the manufacturer has an incentive to fully study the benefits and risks of its medicines. * * *
  • “There are alternative models of how the drug pricing system can work. Take vaccines, for instance. They are not made nearly as expensive as, say, cancer drugs. But, in most cases, drug companies can trust that the market for them will be long and stable.
  • “This brings us back to the cancer drug shortage. All of the medicines in shortage are treatments that are generic, made into commodities by Hatch-Waxman. This problem could be changed if, say, hospitals were in a position to pay more to manufacturers who were seen as having a more stable supply.
  • “All of it is a reminder that the health care system in the U.S. is a Rube Goldberg machine created by past decisions that were made as much out of expediency as sober planning. The IRA, in particular, is another one of these decisions, pushed through a partisan Congress after the pharmaceutical lobby spent decades avoiding real change. It’s not surprising that a bill that has to be ushered in along partisan lines is not fully thought out or that many of the details are left to bureaucrats.
  • “At some point, we might want to actually design something sensible. Until then, we’d be better served by being more conscious of the mess we’re in.”

From the public health front —

• Medscape points out,
  • “The newest version of the COVID-19 vaccine will be available by the end of September, according to the CDC. 
  • “The updated vaccine still needs final sign-offs from the FDA and the CDC.
  • “We anticipate that they are going to be available for most folks by the third or fourth week of September,” Director Mandy Cohen, MD, MPH, said on a podcast last week hosted by former White House COVID adviser Andy Slavitt. “We are likely to see this as a recommendation as an annual COVID shot, just as we have an annual flu shot. I think that will give folks more clarity on whether they should get one or not.”
  • “For people who are considering now whether they should get the currently available COVID vaccine or wait until the new one comes out, Cohen said that depends on a person’s individual risk. People who are 65 or older or who have multiple health conditions should go ahead and get the currently available shot if it’s been more than 6 to 8 months since their last dose. For all other people, it’s OK to wait for the new version.”

• AHA News adds,
  • “Receiving a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine or booster during pregnancy can benefit pregnant people and their newborn infants, according to findings from a federally funded study published in Vaccine. The study looked at 167 pregnant people who received a primary or booster vaccine, which generated antibodies that crossed to the cord blood and likely conferred some protection in their newborns. Participants who received a booster dose had substantially more antibodies in their own blood and in their cord blood, suggesting that boosting increased their newborns’ immune defenses against COVID-19.

• STAT News reports
  • “Every year, doctors get better tools to fight cancer. Engineered cancer-killing cells, immunotherapies, targeted drugs, and more are helping clinicians cure more patients. Increasingly, though, oncologists are trying to use less radiation, long one of the main pillars of cancer therapy. In some cases, they are even keeping certain patients with low-risk tumors off radiation entirely.
  • “We are in an era of radiation omission or de-escalation,” said Corey Speers, vice chair of radiation oncology at the University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University. “Radiation is perhaps one of the most precise and most effective cancer therapies we have, so it will always play an important role in cancer management, but there are situations now on an individual patient basis where radiation may not be needed.”

• MedPage Today notes that “Incident dementia was tied to exposure to fine particulate matter, especially air pollution from wildfires and agriculture, an observational study of 28,000 adults over age 50 suggested.”

From the judicial front,

• A unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit ruled today that ERISA and Medicare Part D preempt certain provisions of an Oklahoma PBM reform law that purport to apply to contracts between PBMs and ERISA and Part D plans. The opinion is helpful to the FEHB Program because the “relates to” clause in the ERISA state law preemption clause, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 1144, is read. analogously or “in pari materia” with the “relates to” clause in the FEHB Act’s state law preemption clause, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 8902(m)(1). Hopefully, this new precedent will pick up steam for ERISA and FEHB preemption of state laws, which do help control premiums.

From the Rx coverage front,

• Healthcare Dive relates
  • “Amazon on Tuesday added more than 15 new manufacturer-sponsored coupons for insulin brands and diabetes care products to its online pharmacy.
  • “The additions bring Amazon’s manufacturer coupons that are automatically applied during check-out for eligible customers to 36.
  • “The new coupons include some of the most commonly prescribed products from drugmakers including Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly and Sanofi, including insulin vials, pens and continuous glucose monitors, according to a blog post on Amazon’s website.

• BioPharma Dive calls attention to
  • “Radiopharmaceuticals for cancer: Making radiation precise
  • “More than a dozen startups are developing drugs that deliver a dose of radiation directly to tumors. Here’s where they stand, and why their progress is worth watching.”

From the U.S. healthcare business front,

• The International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans informs us,
  • “U.S. corporate employers project a median healthcare cost increase of 7% for 2024, according to International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans survey results. The 7% increase is on pace with cost trends projected last year in a similar survey conducted by the International Foundation.
  • “Plan sponsors shared their thoughts on the primary reasons contributing to a rise in medical plan costs for 2024. The top four responses are:
    • 22%—Utilization due to chronic health conditions (up from last year)
    • 19%—Catastrophic claims (same percentage as last year)
    • 16%—Specialty/costly prescription drugs/cell and gene therapy (new in the top four this year)
    • 14%—Medical provider costs (up from last year).
    • The effects of the pandemic appear to be waning as only 4% of responding employers indicated that the primary reason for cost increases is utilization due to delayed preventive/elective care during the pandemic (down from 12% last year).”
  • These factors will be largely offset by Medicare savings for those FEHB plans that are offering Medicare Part D plans for 2024, in the FEHBlog’s view.

• Health Payer Intelligence explains,
  • “How Payers Are Reducing Prior Authorizations, Limiting Care Disruptions
  • “To limit patient care disruptions, payers have reduced prior authorization requirements for genetic testing, cataract surgeries, and physical therapy.”
• and reports
  • “Payers prefer to utilize claims and administration platforms from vendors that are efficient, manage multiple business lines, and can meet their complex needs, according to a KLAS report.
  • “The Payer Claims & Administration Platforms 2023 report includes KLAS Decision Insights data and KLAS performance data, which reflects information about vendors and feedback from healthcare organizations.
  • “Among 28 payer organizations, 14 considered using HealthEdge’s claims and administration solutions. The vendor received an overall performance score of 76.5 on a 100-point scale. Twelve organizations considered using Cognizant, which received a score of 74.7.”

• Healthcare Dive relates
  • “More than three years after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, only 1% of primary care clinicians surveyed by the Larry A. Green Center and the Primary Care Collaborative believe their practice has fully recovered from its impacts, and 61% characterize U.S. primary care as “crumbling.”
  • “Nearly 80% of respondents felt the current workforce is undersized to meet patient needs, and just 19% of clinicians report their practices are fully staffed.
  • “The results are emblematic of a “larger national crisis,” and policymakers must act to reinforce primary care, said Rebecca Etz, co-director of the Larry A. Green Center, in a statement. “ … It is not a matter of if, but when there will be another pandemic … If we don’t act soon, primary care won’t be there when it happens.”