From Washington, DC —
- STAT News reports
- “The U.S. Department of Labor claims in a new lawsuit that a UnitedHealth Group unit illegally rejected emergency room care and urine drug screen claims for thousands of people.
- “UMR, Inc., a Wisconsin-based third-party administrator owned by UnitedHealth, manages benefits for more than 2,100 employee health plans. The federal government says the company denied ER visits and urine drug screens for years using a process that didn’t meet federal standards for health plans that employers fund themselves, known as self-insured plans. The standards are part of a law called the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, or ERISA.
- The FEHBlog is concerned that the focus of the lawsuit is on services that are well known to be overutilized. Moreover, like the Cigna case, the lawsuit is an attack on auto-adjudication, which the government encouraged.
- The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmed a Grade A recommendation that all persons planning to or who could become pregnant take a daily supplement containing 0.4 to 0.8 mg (400 to 800 mcg) of folic acid at least 1 month prior to anticipated conception and continue through the first 2 to 3 months of pregnancy.
From the Medicare front —
- Fierce Healthcare tells us,
- “The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has locked in a 3.1% pay bump for inpatient payments to eligible hospitals during fiscal year 2024, which the agency said translates to a $2.2 billion increase in hospital payments.
- “The baseline inpatient pay rate the agency listed Tuesday afternoon in the FY 2024 Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems (IPPS) and Long-term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System (LTCH PPS) final rule is higher than the 2.8% proposed back in April. However, the listed payout $2.2 billion payout increase is well below the $3.3 billion boost CMS had said in the proposed rule’s fact sheet that hospitals would receive starting this October.
- “The final rule’s inpatient payment rate reflects a projected FY 2024 IPPS hospital market basket update of 3.3%, reduced by a statutory 0.2 percentage point productivity adjustment intended to reflect longitudinal gains in care delivery efficiency. This applies to general acute hospitals that participate in the IPPS Quality Reporting Program and meaningfully use electronic records.”
- Health Payer Intelligence points out,
- “Medicare Part D premiums are projected to decrease from $56.49 in 2023 to $55.50 in 2024, CMS announced.
- “The projected average Part D premium represents the sum of the average basic premium and the average supplemental premium for plans with enhanced coverage.
- “The breakdown of the 2024 premium consists of a $34.50 basic Part D premium and a $21.00 supplemental Part D premium.
- “The agency expects the total Part D premium to fall by 1.8 percent next year, partly due to premium stabilization.
- Starting in 2024, the Inflation Reduction Act limits the growth in the base beneficiary premium to a 6 percent annual increase. The base beneficiary premium is the basis for calculating a plan-specific Part D premium. This premium will increase by 6 percent in 2024 to $34.70. Without the Inflation Reduction Act provision, the cost would have been $4.65 higher at $39.35.”
In other U.S. healthcare news
- U.S. News and World Report issued its 2023 U.S. hospital rankings today.
- Fierce Healthcare relates
- “Nationwide hospital margins continued their upward recovery in June, though analysts warn that not all hospitals are seeing their fortunes improve.
- “Per data from consulting firm Kaufman Hall’s latest monthly report, hospitals’ median year-to-date operating margin index rose to 1.4% while the single-month operating margin index hit 3.8%.
- “Still, “most hospitals underperformed slightly compared to May” due to persistent high expenses and other economic pressures, the firm said. The overall margin improvement could also have benefited from fiscal year-end accounting adjustments, the group wrote in its report, while underlying data suggest that many facilities are finding their finances far from the mean.
- “As margins continue to stabilize on the surface, the gap between high-performing hospitals and those struggling in this new financial environment is widening,” Kaufman Hall said in an accompanying release.”
- The Wall Street Journal reports
- Pfizer reported second-quarter revenue Tuesday that fell short of analysts’ estimates as record sales from its Covid-19 products dry up.
- Pfizer says its strategy of relying on internal innovation is bearing fruit, with a series of new drug approvals coming in the second quarter and drugs from recent deals helping drive revenue.
- Beckers Payer Issues explains
- Around 6 in 10 health plans have provider education in place to promote alternative options to costly GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy for obesity and diabetes treatment, according to a survey from diabetes management provider Vitra Health.
- In a survey of 80 health plan leaders published Aug. 1, all of the leaders responded they were concerned about the rising costs and utilization of GLP-1 drugs. * * *
- See the full survey here.
Hi. I’m curious to know what ERISA federal standard did they fail to follow using their process for rejection? The reset of the article is behind a paywall. As a provider that deals with a lot of self-funded CIGNA plans, I am curious to know if other payers are doing the same.
Hi Carol Here’s the paragraph from the article which identifies the provision in question.
In the case of the ER claims, the lawsuit says UMR did not comply with the Affordable Care Act’s “prudent layperson” standard, which self-insured plans have had to follow since at least 2011. The standard defines an emergency medical condition as one that a “prudent layperson” would expect to put their health in serious jeopardy without medical care.