Midweek Update

David Ermer–Congress, COVID-19, FDA, OPM, U.S. Healthcare–

From Washington, DC,

  • Fedweek compares the House and Senate versions of the appropriations bill that funds OPM and the FEHBP.
  • The Federal Times reports,
    • “Reproductive health advocacy groups and Democratic lawmakers are pressing the Office of Personnel Management on why some insurers offer fewer infertility treatments than they’re required to in federal employee health plans.
    • “In a letter to OPM Director Kiran Ahuja obtained by Federal Times, Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) and Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) said certain providers under the Federal Employee Benefits Program — which serves 8 million beneficiaries — are denying coverage of standard fertility preservation treatments. * * *
    • “For the 2023 plan year, OPM announced it was requiring all FEHB carriers to “provide coverage for standard fertility preservation procedures for … iatrogenic infertility.” Per KFF, “Iatrogenic, or medically induced, infertility refers to when a person becomes infertile due to a medical procedure done to treat another problem, most often chemotherapy or radiation for cancer.”
  • The Federal Times article contends that FEHB plans are not fully compliant with this mandate. OPM has created a process for members to ask for OPM review of claim decisions (following internal plan reconsideration). This process can work out any compliance kinks.
  • InsiderNJ adds,
    • “Today, U.S. Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) and U.S. Representative Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) reintroduced the bicameral Access to Infertility Treatment and Care Act, legislation that would require more health insurers to provide coverage for infertility treatment, as well as fertility preservation services for individuals who undergo medically necessary procedures that may cause infertility, such as chemotherapy. * * *
    • “The full text of the bill can be found here.”
  • AHA News informs us,
    • “The Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice July 19 released for comment through Sept. 18 updated guidance describing how the agencies review mergers and acquisitions to determine compliance with federal antitrust laws. The agencies said the document outlines 13 principles they may use when determining whether a merger is unlawfully anticompetitive and clarifies the frameworks and tools they may use when analyzing a merger with respect to each guideline. 
    • “FTC and DOJ initiated the update with a request for public input in January 2022, and plan to use the comments to update the draft before finalizing the guidelines. For more on the draft guidelines, see the agencies’ fact sheet. AHA intends to submit comments on the proposed guidelines.”
  • Washington Technology tells us,
    • “Maximus is locked in a protest fight after the U.S. Postal Service chose Deloitte Consulting for a $175 million contract to the consulting firm to build a new health benefits system.
    • “By 2025, USPS plans to move that new system for delivering health insurance benefits to its employees. USPS tasked Deloitte Consulting to build the system that would include enrollment processing, eligibility determinations, data analytics and other features, according to solicitation documents on GovTribe.
    • “Maximus filed a protest with the Government Accountability Office on Tuesday to challenge the award. The Office of Personnel Management is managing the contract on behalf of the Postal Service. * * *
    • “A decision from GAO is due Oct. 26.”
  • Cardiovascular Business points out that “The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced that Medtronic is recalling nearly 350,000 implantable cardiac devices due to continued issues with their ability to deliver high voltage therapy when necessary.”

From the public health front –

  • The Wall Street Journal reports,
    • “You might know a Covid-19 super-dodger who was infected with the virus but didn’t get sick. Their luck could be written in their genes. 
    • “A DNA variation that affects the immune system can boost a person’s odds of avoiding Covid-19 symptoms, a study found. The work, published Wednesday in the journal Nature, helps explain why some people infected with the virus that causes Covid-19 don’t fall ill. 
    • “The T cells of some people with the variation can find and kill the virus without having seen it before, researchers said. That is because the part of the virus their T cells home in on is similar enough to common coronaviruses they have already encountered.  
    • “There are people out there that have got strong prior immunity from their common coronavirus exposures,” said Danny Altmann, a professor of immunology at Imperial College London, who wasn’t involved in the study. The work could help researchers design better vaccines, Altmann said.” 
  • STAT News relates,
    • “Cancer drugs can burn through tumors like wildfire, killing off the vast majority of malignant cells. But a few stubborn cells often end up surviving, seeding a recurrence of the disease. The prevailing theory behind this drug resistance is built on natural selection: Among the vast and genetically diverse population of cancer cells in a tumor, some have random mutations that help these cells survive an onslaught.
    • “But this is not the full picture,” said Yogesh Goyal, a cancer researcher at Northwestern University. Goyal and his colleagues at the University of Pennsylvania demonstrated in a series of experiments that cancer cells can survive treatments just by having certain genes turned on, even if they were nearly genetically identical to cancer cells that died but had activated different genes.
    • “We think this work stands to really change how we think about therapy resistance,” said Arjun Raj, the study’s co-senior author and a bioengineer at the University of Pennsylvania.
    • “In other words, mutations alone cannot fully explain resistance to cancer therapy. Instead, researchers may need to look more closely at the assemblage of genes turned on or off at any given time in a cancer cell — what scientists call the cell’s transcriptional profile — to better understand whether it will respond to a certain drug, Goyal said.”

From the U.S. healthcare business front —

  • Healthcare Dive lets us know
    • “Elevance’s second-quarter earnings alleviated recent cost trend and utilization concerns, as the health insurer reported lower medical spending than analysts expected.
    • “The payer beat Wall Street expectations for the quarter with revenue of $43.7 billion, up 13% year over year, and profit of $1.9 billion, up 14% year over year. * * *
    • “Elevance reported a medical loss ratio of 86.4%, down 70 basis points year over year due to premium rate adjustments reflecting the post-pandemic cost of care, CFO John Gallina told investors on a Wednesday morning call.”
  • Fierce Healthcare informs us,
    • “Amar Desai, M.D., wrote in a post on LinkedIn Wednesday that he is “thrilled” to come back to the UnitedHealth Group subsidiary as the CEO of Optum Health. Desai previously spent several years in leadership roles at Optum before taking the role of president of healthcare delivery at rival CVS Health.
    • “Desai is also an associate clinical professor of medicine at the Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California. He previously served as president of HealthCare Partners, which was acquired in 2019 by UHG as part of DaVita Medical Group.”
  • The Society for Human Resource Management reports
    • “U.S. organizations are budgeting an average increase of 4 percent in 2024, according to consulting firm WTW, which surveyed more than 2,000 U.S. organizations for its Salary Budget Planning Survey. That number is down from the actual increase of 4.4 percent in 2023, and the 4.2 percent increase in 2022, but the projected 2024 figures remain higher than the 3.1 percent salary increase budget in 2021 as well as other increases in pre-pandemic years.”