Midweek Update

Photo by Manasvita S on Unsplash

Govexec and the Federal Times report about yesterday’s release of OPM’s Postal Service Health Benefits Program interim final rule.

Fedweek offers interesting observations on the federal workforce demographics:

“For years, [federal agencies] focused on the “retirement wave”—or still more sweeping, the “retirement tsunami”—when the Baby Boom population hit retirement eligibility. That view continues today, with the constant repetition of statistics such as that 15 percent of the federal workforce is already eligible to retire, and that in five years 30 percent of current employees will be eligible.

“That wave never happened and there is no reason to believe it will.

“What has actually happened is that federal retirements have been a fairly steady flow at around 60,000 to 70,000 each year from agencies apart from the Postal Service (which accounts for about 40,000 more on average). That’s around 3 percent per year, so when it’s five years later, 15 percent or so already have retired and there’s still only 15 percent who are eligible.

“Since those first soundings about a retirement wave, the workforce actually has been increasing in age. The average is now 47—five years older than the overall U.S. workforce—with about 28.7 percent age 55 or above, up by a half-point just in the last six years. The percentage aged 60 and older—which more or less equates to retirement eligibility—rose from 9.4 to 14.5 percent over the last 15 years.”

This is the demographic challenge facing the FEHB Program which is ameliorated by the coordination of benefits with Medicare beginning at age 65. OPM improved the opportunities for coordination of benefits with Medicare by allowing carriers to integrate Medicare Part D prescription drug plans for 2024.

From the public health front —

  • Dana Farber Cancer Institute offers insights into which States have the highest cancer rates.
  • The Department of Human Services announced making progress in the “whole of government” response to long Covid.

“[E]xperts say there is little public awareness about CMV compared to other viral infections that can infect a fetus in utero, such as HIV, Zika, and toxoplasmosis, all of which are far rarer than CMV infections. Professional societies recommend pre-pregnancy counseling and monitoring for HIV, but not for CMV. And testing for the infection in newborns isn’t widespread.”[E]xperts say there is little public awareness about CMV compared to other viral infections that can infect a fetus in utero, such as HIV, Zika, and toxoplasmosis, all of which are far rarer than CMV infections. Professional societies recommend pre-pregnancy counseling and monitoring for HIV, but not for CMV. And testing for the infection in newborns isn’t widespread.

“Through my entire career, it’s been so clear that this field is really lacking in progress,” said Laura Gibson, an infectious diseases physician at UMass Memorial Health. “It’s just been frustrating to all of us in the field over decades.”

“That is starting to change, as state public health committees and legislatures begin to debate whether to mandate doing more robust screening for CMV. In 2019, Ontario became the first region in the world to test every baby for CMV. This year, Minnesota followed suit.”

“Obesity and diabetes in mothers have traditionally been considered risk factors for the child to also develop obesity. But a new study suggests that more narrow measures of health during pregnancy could help better assess that risk.

“Researchers grouped pregnant women based on specific metabolic traits and found that insulin resistance was associated with the highest risk, compared with other traits such as high cholesterol and triglycerides, according to a study published in JAMA Network Open on Tuesday.

“The risk linked to insulin resistance was even higher than that associated with prepregnancy obesity, defined as a body mass index over 30, and with diabetes diagnosed in gestation, the study said.”

From the Rx coverage front —

  • AHIP offers a new resource that “highlights how biosimilars offer an effective, lower-cost alternative to a brand name biologic product. In the last 10 years, for example, $36 billion of biosimilar medication spending was associated with $56 billion in savings. And savings from biosimilars are expected to exceed $180 billion over the next 5 years — a more than 4-fold increase from the last 5 years.”
  • STAT News reports on cancer drug shortages that have plagued our country for years.

From the telehealth front, mhealth intelligence informs us that “According to the FAIR Health Monthly Telehealth Regional tracker, telehealth use increased [7.3%] across the country in January, with rates rising at the national level and in all US Census regions.” My word, telehealth use increased in the winter?!?

Finally, in Medicare Advantage and Part D News, CMS lowered the boom on Medicare Advantage and Part D plans with a new final rule to “strengthen Medicare Advantage and hold health insurance companies to higher standards for America’s seniors and people with disabilities by cracking down on misleading marketing schemes by Medicare Advantage plans, Part D plans and their downstream entities; removing barriers to care created by complex coverage criteria and utilization management; and expanding access to behavioral health care.” This action follows a payment policy and risk adjustment rule compromise last week.