From the Postal Reform front, health benefits expert Robert Moffitt, whose work the FEHBlog admires, wrote a column titled “It’s a bad idea to use the Medicare to bail out the Postal Service.” On this occasion, the FEHBlog finds himself in disagreement with Mr. Moffitt.

1. Medicare is not bailing out the Postal Service. Since 1984, the Postal Service and its employees has paid and continues to pay Medicare taxes for its employees until they retire. At that point, Medicare becomes primary to FEHB and other group health coverage by law.
2. Every other business in America that provides health benefits coverage to its retirees essentially follows the same approach as the Postal Service will be authorized to do by this bill.
3. The Postal reform bill is unique in that it creates a special Part B enrollment period for current annuitants as of January 1, 2024, who have Part A but declined to enroll for Part B, an option which OPM encourages. Under the bill that that House passed this week, the Postal Service will bear the cost of the late enrollment penalties associated with this special enrollment period.
4. Mr. Moffitt suggests that Postal Service Health Benefit Program (PSHBP) Medicare annuitants may find it necessary to purchase Medicare supplement insurance. However, we know from experience that PSHBP plans will follow the practice of existing FEHB plans and wrap their benefits around Medicare to fill those Medicare gaps. The PSHBP coverage is the Medicare supplemental coverage available to Medicare annuitants in FEHB and the PSHBP, and more tightly integrating PSHBP and Medicare coverage will result in lower premiums for all PSHBP enrollees.

Bear in mind that studies have shown the group health plans subsidize Medicare by making payments to healthcare providers that substantially exceed Medicare’s low reimbursements.

From the No Surprises Act (“NSA”) front —

• CMS issued more FAQs on the federal independent dispute resolution (“IDR”) process today.
• Consumer Reports identifies five healthcare scenarios which fall outside the scope of the No Surprises Act.
• Fierce Healthcare brings us up to date on the healthcare provider association lawsuits challenging the federal government’s decision to treat the NSA’s qualifying payment amount as the lodestar in federal IDR arbitrations.

From the Omicron front, Medscape reports that “The U.S. government is planning to roll out COVID-19 shots for children under the age of 5 as soon as Feb. 21, according to a document from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. * * * Young children [beginning at six months] will receive a lower dose of the vaccine, if it is authorized. Pfizer/BioNTech tested a 3-microgram dose of the vaccine in the age group, compared with a 10-microgram dose in 5- to 11-year-olds and 30 micrograms for people aged 12 and older.”

Also, the Department of Health and Human Services announced that “the federal government has purchased 600,000 treatment courses of a new monoclonal antibody treatment that data shows works against the Omicron variant. The new monoclonal antibody treatment, bebtelovimab, is manufactured by Eli Lilly and Company, and if it receives emergency use authorization (EUA) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), HHS will make the treatment available to states free of charge.”

From the COVID vaccine mandate front, Govexec tells us

A federal appeals court has denied the Biden administration’s request to undo the pause on its COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal employees, leaving in place a ban on agencies enforcing the requirement. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit opted not to weigh in on the Justice Department’s petition for immediate relief, meaning the mandate will likely remain enjoined for at least several months. The only path for quicker resolution would be for the administration to appeal further tNBo the Supreme Court, an option it has not yet said it will explore. A Justice spokeswoman declined to comment. 

From the miscellany department

• NIH News discusses advances in breast cancer screening and treatment.

• NBC News reports

The clipboard of paper forms that for decades has been a standard part of Americans’ doctor visits may soon be a thing of the past. 

Federal authorities who oversee health technology have set a deadline for December for the health care industry to support smartphone apps, like Apple Health, that store records electronically. 

Their goal is to have patients use their phones to electronically share records with a doctor’s office or hospital — without a pen and paper, if they choose. 

“Patients ought to be able to use the app of their choice,” said Micky Tripathi, who’s helping to put the federal rules in place as the Biden administration’s national coordinator for health information technology. 

“Every patient has the deep frustration of going to a hospital and they give you a clipboard and you have to fill out all the information, and then you go to another part of the same hospital and they give you the clipboard again,” Tripathi said. 

The FEHBlog has been reading articles about the demise of the clipboard throughout this century. However, he thinks that this worthy idea may soon come to fruition.