The FEHBlog was particularly struck by an in-depth article in the Wall Street Journal about a lower income man in his sixties who emptied his retirement plan to pay for hospital bills for his wife who was stricken with cervical cancer. How does this happen in the Affordable Care Act world. The FEHBlog is not blaming the law. Rather the FEHBlog believes that people from the hospital, the insurance company, etc. dropped the ball when they had a chance to help this now broken man. The woman’s adult daughter, presumably the man’s step daughter, created a Go Fund Me page. Isn’t that a red flag?

The Journal also reports from Capitol Hill that the President’s Hail Mary pass to score a legislative victory with the billion dollar infrastructure bill fell short.

The Mercer consulting company is offering a report on furious state legislative efforts this year to regulate prescription benefit managers in the wake of last December’s U.S. Supreme Court decision on ERISA preemption and such laws, which was favorable to the state legislatures. The laws in the FEHBlog’s view while well intentioned mainly raise administrative costs.

Govexec in an Open Season related article discusses the No Surprises Act provisions that take effect on January 1, 2022, for enrollees with primary FEHB coverage in the United States. The FEHBlog does expect that this law will achieve its objective of getting patients out of the middle of billing disputes between out of network providers and health plans in emergency care, ancillary care at hospitals and surgicenters and air ambulances. The article notes that “The new rules don’t apply to people with coverage through programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, the Indian Health Service, the Veterans Affairs health system or TRICARE, because these programs already have other protections against high medical bills.”

From the third quarter financial reporting front / telehealth front, Healthcare Dive tells us that

• “Teladoc plans to take on financial risk for its offerings in the future, including its virtual-first primary service, in a bid to expand revenue per member, the CEO of the New York-based virtual care giant said Wednesday.
• The telehealth vendor made that program, called Primary360, available nationwide earlier this month, and it will be available through CVS Health-owned payer Aetna and Centene’s marketplace plans in Michigan, Mississippi, South Caroline and Texas early next year. And Teladoc is also beginning to talk with health systems about using Primary360 as a white-labeled digital front door to care for their populations, CFO Mala Murphy told investors on a call.
• In its third quarter financial results also released Wednesday, Teladoc beat Wall Street expectations on earnings and revenue, with a topline of $522 million, up 81% year over year due to strength in multi-product sales and behavioral health, management said. The 19-year-old vendor saw 3.9 million visits in the quarter, representing 37% year-over-year growth.”

From the Affordable Care Act front, Kaiser Health News reports that

The federal government’s effort to penalize hospitals for excessive patient readmissions is ending its first decade with Medicare cutting payments to nearly half the nation’s hospitals.

In its 10th annual round of penalties, Medicare is reducing its payments to 2,499 hospitals, or 47% of all facilities. The average penalty is a 0.64% reduction in payment for each Medicare patient stay from the start of this month through September 2022. The fines can be heavy, averaging $217,000 for a hospital in 2018, according to Congress’ Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, or MedPAC. Medicare estimates the penalties over the next fiscal year will save the government $521 million. Thirty-nine hospitals received the maximum 3% reduction, and 547 hospitals had so few returning patients that they escaped any penalty.

Here is a link to KHN’s online tool to look up hospitals to find out whether the hospital was assessed a 2022 penalty.

From the reports and studies department —

• The Kaiser Family Foundation released its COVID vaccine monitor for October 2021.

• The American Medical Association discusses a study concluding that, notwithstanding a tremendous amount of consolidation between health systems and providers, private practices continue to play a “big part” in primary care, which the FEHBlog finds reassuring.

• Health Payer Intelligence informs us

From the beginning, it was clear that seniors’ lives would be turned upside down as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, but Humana’s survey of over 1,000 seniors reveal the severe toll the pandemic has taken on senior mental health and social health.

“Health plans should take particular notice, since it is critical to understand all the evolving needs of seniors – health, social and behavioral – as the industry increasingly moves toward models of ‘whole health’ senior care and coverage,” said Kathy Driscoll, senior vice president and chief nursing officer at Humana.

The survey reached 1,003 Americans ages 64 and older, nationwide. Kelton Global fielded the survey from September 14 to September 21, 2021.

One of the most striking results of the survey was that, despite the rise in mental and behavioral healthcare needs and the expanded access to telemental and telebehavioral services that the pandemic brought, only three percent of seniors had accessed mental healthcare.

The results run parallel with a separate Anthem study which found that mental healthcare claims dropped even though mental healthcare demand rose during the coronavirus pandemic.

However, the low rate of telehealth utilization for these specific demands does not mean that seniors were as hesitant to use telehealth for other health-related purposes. Seniors were far more likely to use telehealth in order to access wellness programming (84 percent) and a third of seniors used telehealth to connect with their providers.