Postal Reform Update and More

David Ermer–Congress, Federal employment benefits, U.S. Healthcare–

The Washington Post reports today that

A bipartisan group of senators [led by the Chair and Ranking Member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee] introduced legislation Wednesday to lift significant financial burdens off the ailing U.S. Postal Service while tightening accountability requirements for mail delivery, a major stride for an agency that has tussled with its balance sheet and reputation for the better part of a year. The bill, identical to a version that has advanced in the House [H.R. 3706], would repeal $5 billion a year in mandatory retiree health-care expenses and require future postal retirees to enroll in Medicare[ via a Postal Service Health Benefits Program (“PSHBP’) within the FEHB Program]. Advocates say the measures would save the agency $30 billion over the next decade.

FedSmith recapitulates the key aspects of the PSHBP provisions in the House bill for us. FedSmith also helpfully shares NARFE’s comments on the House bill. However, FedSmith concludes that “What is not mentioned in the [House] bill, but a possibility that could impact the rest of the federal workforce is the possibility that this “reform” package could become just the first step in removing federal retirees from the FEHB.”

With all due respect to FedSmith, OPM, and presumably Congress, knows full well that removing retirees from the FEHB would discourage federal employees from opting for long term employment with the government. Currently, if a federal employee has at least five years of FEHB coverage preceding their civil service retirement, they carry FEHB coverage into retirement with the full government contribution.

FEHB coverage tops any Medicare supplement plan out there by a long shot. What’s more the dirty little secret of Medicare is that federal law does not prohibit Medicare supplement plans to impose pre-existing condition limitations on prospective members except when an individual becomes first eligible for Medicare. (Only four northeast states prohibit that practice.) For example, the FEHBlog lives in Maryland which allows Medicare supplement plans to impose pre-existing condition limitations. If the FEHBlog had picked a Medicare Advantage plan initially and later wanted to switch to traditional Medicare, his selection of Medicare supplement plans would be limited particularly he had encountered health problems.

In any event, annuitants with primary Medicare coverage are good FEHB risks who help control premiums for everyone. For those reasons, the FEHBlog does not foresee annuitants being removed from the FEHB. He would like to see OPM permit FEHB carriers to offer Medicare Part D prescription drug plan integration in their “traditional” plans because that Part D integration and not the Part A and B integration will generate the greatest savings for the PSHBP carriers. Congress already opened the door the FEHB integration with Medicare Part D In the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 which created Part D.

Here are some other nuggets of interest:

  • Reg Jones continues his series on federal employee benefits in FedWeek. This week’s article concerns opportunities to enroll in or change coverage in federal employee benefit programs upon marriage.
  • The National Committee for Quality Assurance takes us on a trip along the road to health equity.
  • Healthcare Dive reports that “CommonSpirit Health and Essentia Health have called off a deal for Essentia to acquire 14 CommonSpirit facilities in North Dakota and Minnesota, the two Catholic systems announced Tuesday.”